The case vote was ruled 7-2 in the favor of the children. The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the lower court on the basis that “students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates”. The act of the children wearing the armbands in protest was completely passive and led to no disturbance to the school’s activity. Despite the prior sidings of the lower courts with the school board, the Supreme Court recognized that the children’s suspension was not justified with the actions they performed. Cases such as Meyer v. Nebraska, Bartels v. Iowa, et cetera that argued the first amendment rights of students in situations concerning school environments were drawn on to support the final holding of the Supreme Court’s decision. In reference to Burnside v. Byarwars, in order to justifiably prohibit the wear of the armbands the action must have led to forbidden conduct of some sorts. The Supreme Court highlighted that despite the district court’s views, “undifferentiated fear or apprehension” was not grounds enough to “overcome the right to freedom of expression” in any