To What Extent Was Andrew Jackson A Good President

Words: 459
Pages: 2

In my opinion, I think Andrew Jackson is not a good president. I have many different reasons to support my opinion, and I will show them in the text. He did not treat people well, and he only did what he thought was right and didn’t listen to others.

Andrew Jackson was called by many the “man of the people”. I do not think this is a correct statement due to the fact that he had a lot of criticism during his presidency, as well as many errors. During the National Bank war, in the ending of the text, it clearly states, “Many in Congress believed that the president had abused his power during the bank crisis and, as a result, Jackson was censured by Congress in 1834. President Jackson could have hardly cared less.” He did not care about what the people had to say, as well as even tried to understand why they felt that way. It says, “He was convinced the bank war resulted in a landmark victory for the American people.”

President Andrew Jackson did not treat the Native Americans with the respect they deserved. He had no care
…show more content…
This crisis was averted because it says “"Jackson agreed to reduce the tariff in exchange for southern compliance, however the idea that states can nullify federal law will lead to more talk of secession in the decades to come." They came to an agreement and agreed to reduce the tariff. During the Bank war, Jackson viewed the bank as unconstitutional. In the text it says, "Jefferson believed that Congress lacked the power to create a banking system; the action was therefore unconstitutional." Therefore, he decided to create a plan. "He announced a plan to remove all federal funds from the bank and redistribute the money to various state banks, thereby starving the bank to death." The American public reacted with frustration. Jackson made a statement saying “I killed the bank.” He said this