Tom Regan Animal Rights

Words: 1398
Pages: 6
Open Document
Loyal Dog or Human Liability?
Tom Regan’s Case for Animal Rights gives a scenario in which there is a group of people and a dog floating on a raft after a shipwreck. A dilemma arises when the survivors realize the raft is sinking rapidly and cannot hold all of its occupants, lest they sink and everyone on board becomes shark bait and dies. There is one solution to save lives, but it requires one person on board to decide between a well trained hunting dog or an antisocial potentially liable human to be cast into the sea to die, lessening the stress of the sinking lifeboat. Survivors then float to a nearby island where they will live together. Who should be granted the right to live and who should be sentenced to death? Clearly the most ethical …show more content…
As a result Regan has come under the scrutiny of many other philosophers who declare his stance a contradiction of his own beliefs. Regan rebuts critics by explaining how a special circumstance justifies a change in decision without compromising his overall stance. Regan argues that animals have inherent value and rights, yet he believes that the dog should be cast from the lifeboat in the given situation. In order to justify the decision to throw the dog off of the lifeboat, he employs what he terms the worse-off principle in conjunction with the claim that death makes human beings worse off than dogs. According to Susan Finsen, utilitarianism suggests that if we can maximize the happiness of many people by severely harming a few, this is acceptable. In this case she is agreeing with Tom …show more content…
The dog would most likely suffer and die on the island without the understanding of what is happening and it would be a greater harm to the dog to keep it. “If death would be a lesser harm for the dog than it would be for any of the human survivors, then the dogs right not to be harmed would not be violated if he were cast overboard.” (Tom Regan, The Dog in the Lifeboat: An Exchange) On the contrary, others say that it is impossible to really understand what it’s like to be another type of animal or know what they feel. Thomas Nagel, author of What is it like to be a bat?, pg 197 states, “Humans inherently have the same value as any animal. Humans can’t really judge what life is like for any other animals including
Show More

Related Documents: Tom Regan Animal Rights

Animal Rights Human Wrongs By Tom Regan

a pet or have a professional career taking care of animals. Even though we hunt animals for certain resources, we can still need them for proper goods. People might debate between the two authors about their reasoning. Two of the prominent authors were Tom Regan and Stephan Rose. In both of the article “Animal rights, Human wrongs” by Tom Regan and “Proud to be specialist” by Stephen Rose, two divergent aspects are expressed towards animal rights and medical specimen. In the articles, the author’s…

Words 1779 - Pages 8

Cece's Facts Essay

Tom Regan and the issue of animal rights affect everyone around the world. He feels that humans in a way can somewhat relate to what animals go through when they are being mistreated. But the one thing I question is how do animals compare to human beings? How can the rights of animals affect human beings in a way to make them feel that they have anything in common? According to Regan, animals and humans do have some sort of connection to one another. But we would have to look deep into detail in…

Words 1110 - Pages 5

Peter Singer's Violation Of The Moral Rights Of Animals

The moral considerability of a non-human animal is frequently based on intelligence, moral capacity, or similar ideas. However, the moral considerability of an animal should be based on equal consideration of interests. For example, one might say that its okay to use a rabbit for his fur due to the fact that a rabbit holds a fraction of our brain capacity. However, how does a rabbit’s brain capacity allow for exploitation? We can not base the worthiness of an animal’s life by comparing their interests…

Words 903 - Pages 4

Morally Obligated Research Paper

nonsentient entities”? To understand my reason behind why I believe that we are morally obligated, you must first understand what the key words mean to me or how I understand them. First, “morally obligated” meaning no matter if something is good or right, bad or wrong you must do it, it is your duty and there is not a choice or say in the matter. Second, “nonsentient” also known as not having consciousness (other characteristic of the mind) and or not having the ability to have subjective perceptual…

Words 999 - Pages 4

Essay about answers q2

greatest good CORRECT all of the above Instructor Explanation: The answer can be found in section 2.1 of Understanding Philosophy Question 2. Question : According to the video “Meet Your Meat”, which of the following is not true of how animals are slaughtered on factory farms Student Answer: They are driven in extreme weather conditions without food or water They are often still conscious while being slaughtered They are often roughly handled and severely injured by the…

Words 1829 - Pages 8

Animal Rights In Animal Testing

Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques…

Words 1542 - Pages 7

Animal Testing: The Accuracy Of Animal Experiments

bad thing about animal testing is the accuracy of the experiment. Animals and humans aren’t the same in every single way, after all humans can talk; therefore, this makes it difficult to come up with accurate results of their tests. Since the animals tested are living animals, they require certain needs such as: food, shelter, and treatment to stay alive until the end of the research. They are crammed in cages to fend for themselves. They get very little food and water. Some animals don’t even make…

Words 440 - Pages 2

Animal Testing Research Paper

First, I feel strongly that animal rights are ignored when they are used in medical testing. Tom Regan, a philosophy professor at Northstate University, discusses in an article the fact that animals have a basic right to respectable treatment. This value is not respected when animals are reduced to being basically tools in a scientific experiment. He felt that people and animals seem to be alike in several ways. According to Regan we each feel, think about, and acknowledge pain. If this is the case…

Words 1043 - Pages 5

Essay on king lear

Lear's mock trial of Regan and Goneril. Gloucester enters and reveals that he has learned of a plot to kill the king. The group prepares to take Lear to Dover, where friends can come to his aid. Analysis Edmund's gibberish about foul fiends certainly fits both Edgar and Lear's circumstances, since both have been victims of deceit and wickedness. Once they all come in out of the storm, Lear abandons his plans for seeking physical revenge, and instead, decides to place Goneril and Regan on trial. The audience…

Words 5002 - Pages 21

Animal Rights Research Paper

Seminar 26 April 2013 Animal Rights Everyone has their own opinions on animal rights. Some think animals should have the same rights as humans and some do not. Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an ‘inherent worth”. They believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. They believe all animals are unique just like humans. Non-supporters believe animals aren’t as important as humans and use animals for things such as entertainment…

Words 1525 - Pages 7