Animal Testing Research Paper

First, I feel strongly that animal rights are ignored when they are used in medical testing. Tom Regan, a philosophy professor at Northstate University, discusses in an article the fact that animals have a basic right to respectable treatment. This value is not respected when animals are reduced to being basically tools in a scientific experiment. He felt that people and animals seem to be alike in several ways. According to Regan we each feel, think about, and acknowledge pain. If this is the case should they then not be treated with the same respect as us. It seems animal rights are ignored in an effort for the benefit of people. Animals are subjected to tests that usually painful or cause permanent damage or death, and that they are never …show more content…
An organization called, the American Veterinary Medical Association defines animal pain as extremely like how humans react to pain. Animals feel pain in several of the same ways in which humans do; in truth, their reactions to the pain could be very similar. For an example, both humans and animals scream. Once animals are a used for product testing or laboratory analysis, they're subjected to painful and sometimes deadly experiments. Two of the foremost ordinarily used safety checks are the Draize check and the LD50 test, each of which are a notorious for the extreme pain and suffering they inflict upon being tested on animals. Within the Draize check the substance or product being tested is placed within the eyes of an animal (generally a rabbit is employed for this test); then the animal is monitored for harm to the tissue layer and alternative tissues in and close to the attention. This care can be extremely painful for the animal, and visual defect, scarring, and death are typically the results. The Draize check has been criticized for being unreliable and an unnecessary waste of animal life. The LD50 check is employed to check the dose of a substance that's …show more content…
Several cosmetic companies, for instance, have found better ways that to check their merchandise without the use of animal subjects. In Against Animal Testing, a pamphlet printed by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetic and bath-product company based mostly in London, the event of merchandise that use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, likewise as others with an extended history of safe human usage. Is successful despite not testing on animals. Moreover, the Draize check has multiple alternatives, owing to the event of an artificial cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin. Researchers will check the potential harm that a product will do to the skin by usage of this artificial "skin" rather than testing on animals. Another alternative to the current process could be a product known as Eyetex. This artificial material turns opaque once a product damages it, closely resembling the means that a true eye as it reacts to harmful substances. In another methodology, in vitro testing, cellular tests are done within tubes. All those tests are established to be helpful and reliable alternatives to testing merchandise on live animals. Therefore, because effective means of product toxicity testing are available without the use of live animals, testing potentially deadly substances on animals is

Show More