As the argument continues animal testing should be banned due to the unethical and immoral terms of abusing animals, the unreliability of the test and the insufficiency of the method.
The oppose argues that animals do not have rights and they do not have the mental ability that humans do. However, animals have rights which are respected in different countries. It is not ethical to kill animals just because they advance medical research achievement. According to Animal Welfare Act and Regulation (2012), the law intend to regulate the transport, sale and handling of dogs, cats, guinea pigs, nonhuman primates, hamsters and rabbits intended to use for research or other purposes. Animals have feeling, as they breathe, drink and eat just like humans do. Animals are living organisms just like human. They are not born to be tortured or abused .Harmless animals are …show more content…
However, Most of these tests are impractical and are not necessary used on humans. Drugs could fail in the different processes of medical trial, and the danger of side effects may be found in the human trials. With thousands of humans use a medicine the potential of finding new side effects increases. According to Nature Biotechnology (1998), ninety-two percent of drugs conducted by animal tests fail on humans because they are too dangerous and/or useless. Animals are different from human beings therefore they are poor test material. Drugs that work on animals do not necessarily work on humans. As Science Museum (2013) Argues, the sleeping pill Thalidomide was tested on animals first, but when used on humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with harsh deformities. That indicates how unreliable and dangerous drug testing can