Triangle Fire

Words: 563
Pages: 3

In the story, “Flesh and Blood So Cheap: The Triangle Fire and its Legacy,” by Albert Marrin, the author tells readers how the factory owners Harris and Blanck did not fall responsible for the factory fire even though Harris and Blanck were paid for the dead bodies. The identification of six bodies was not made until one hundred years had passed. Max Blanck and Isaac Harris must be held accountable for the deaths of 146 people, which includes 23 men and 123 young women. Although people say they are not, they are responsible for all these deaths. Despite being found innocent in court, Harris and Blanck are still guilty. To start off, Harris and Blanck are responsible for the 146 deaths that happened that day. For example, when workers were trying to escape the fire using the doors, …show more content…
5. The adage of the adage. It is evident that people were so frightened that they were unable to open the door. This is crucial because it demonstrates how individuals failed to listen to those who were trying to save them. A lot more people would have survived if the door had opened outward instead of inward. The owners are responsible for the fact that they should have had doors swinging outward to make it easier to escape in case of emergencies. On the other hand, other people would think that Max Blanck and Isaac Harris are innocent because they raised pay and shortened work hours, but that doesn’t mean they didn’t start the fire. The fact that they were being paid four hundred dollars while the families were being paid seventy-five doesn’t make them innocent. For example, some girls were trying to save themselves by jumping out of windows so they didn’t get burned by the fire, but they still died on impact when they hit the ground. In the text it states, “The first ten thud-deads shocked me. I looked up and saw that there were scores of girls at the windows.” (Shepherd par. 4. The adage of the