Tsar Nicholas II: The Russian Revolution

Words: 556

Pages: 3

Open Document

The Russian revolution, a series of events that transpired for many different reasons. This includes an unfair government, corruption and many other causes. The Russian revolution, had a wind up, the events that caused the revolution, and the end and how certain things became affected. The Russian government started as a Monarchy, which was ruled by the Tsar. The Tsar in control at the time was Tsar Nicholas II. Many things occurred under his rule that led to the revolution. Many of the causes were during World War 1, one big reason was that Russia was very behind with technology, and had very few supplies to fight the war with. And on top of that the Tsar himself took complete control of the military. This contributed to them losing 2 million men during the years 1914 to 1916. This also outraged citizen which began to lead to the Revolution. In february 1917, the Tsar began to ration bread, and this had woman who worked long days to wait in long lines afterwards for just a small amount of bread. This then lead to the day March 8,1917, which is the day the …show more content…
The rule of Kerensky was brought to a quick demise once Lenin appeared. Vladimir Lenin was the promising leader, he promised bread, peace and land to all. Vladimir's followers were referred to as the “Reds”, but their real name was the Bolsheviks which means majority, they had this name even if they were the minority at the time. Soon after they adopted the red flag which is what led to them being referred to as the reds. The bolsheviks finally overthrew Kerensky completely on November 9, 1917. Although they were in control now, they still met resistance from the whites, which consisted of former landowners, former government officials, and the Russian army. And these people , the “whites, were backed by the U.S, France, and

Russian Revolution Research Paper

Russian Revolution ID’s People Czar Nicholas II Czar Nicholas II came to power in 1894. He believed in his father, Alexander III’s, belief that absolute power of the tsars should be preserved. However Nicholas II lacked the vision and responsibility required of a leader. Nicholas II allowed many of his decisions to be heavily controlled by his wife, Alexandra, and a peasant named Rasputin. Rasputin was able to stop their hemophiliac son from bleeding…

Words 1824 - Pages 8

Russia's Autocracy In Russia

At the turn of the twentieth century, Russia remained one of the few countries in the world under autocratic rule. This meant that the Tsar held almost unlimited authority over the country, and “granted the population no voice in government and severely punished any expressions of discontentment with the status quo” (Pipes, 18). In order to rule such a system effectively, it would require an autocrat not only in name but in personality, “someone who enjoyed the prerogatives of power and knew how…

Words 1113 - Pages 5

February Revolution Essay examples

How far was Russia’s role in World War One responsible for the February Revolution and the collapse of tsardom in 1917? (Consider all short and long term factors in your response.) There have not been many instances in history which were so significant not only for the national situation but also for the events being played on international scene as the February Revolution in Russia. As far as outcomes are concerned, the end of Tsardom as one of them, historians are quite in agreement. However…

Words 1605 - Pages 7

Tsar Essay

Tsar Nicholas II The Tsar crowned as supreme ruler of Russia was in need of a new face, so in 1894 a new Tsar was crowned. Nicholas II became the new Tsar of Russia and was praised by many peasants upon his crowning, often referred to as ‘The Little Father of Russia’ he was seen as the saviour of the country but later throughout his reign he would be seen as a weak leader and a failure to the people. His upbringing would cause him to not agree with the necessary change and reform that the people…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

Tsars: Tsar Nicholas Essay

Was the Russian Revolution the Tsar’s fault? In this essay, I will decide whether the Russian Revolution was entirely the Tsars fault, I will give reasons from both sides, with supporting evidence, write a conclusion and decide whether the Russian Revolution was the Tsars fault. The Tsar was a wealthy man, who ruled Russia between 1884 and 1917, He was not a good ruler.He lost an easy battle against Japan, he was also behind on what was happening.He didn’t bring the army back and was unprepared when the First world war started…

Words 392 - Pages 2

Essay about Tsar: Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Nicholas

opposed nationalism because they were multi-ethnic. The Tsar of Russia was Nicholas II, who was married to Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna. Tsar had many challenges towards his power that have happened throughout history including protests. Tsar depended on his army to keep his power. The Tsarist government of Russia faced serious dangers from 1900 to the outbreak of war in 1914 because of the citizens unrest, the political influences that challenged Tsar, and economic unrest in Russia which came from wars…

Words 707 - Pages 3

Essay on Russia And The Soviet Union

Russia and the Soviet Union Russian Society The Peasants- Until 1861- the peasants had been serfs, slaves of their landlords with no rights, no freedom and no land of their own Tsar Nicholas II grandfather, Tsar Alexander II freed the peasants from serfdom and allowed them to own the land Being freed from serfdom on these conditions did not improve the lives of the peasants Mirs divided up the land in the communes and gave it out to each family according to its needs that year: The bigger the family…

Words 1703 - Pages 7

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

The development of opposition to the Romanov Dynasty before 1914 was a build-up over time of the Romanov Dynasty and Tsar Nicholas II’s rule. It was a build-up of tension and repression amongst the Russian people. Russia at the time was made mostly of peasants living in poverty, and made up 80% of the population of Russia and only had 20% of the nation’s wealth. The nobility and Tsar’s family had most of the nation’s wealth. The Tsar’s family and nobility, including the Orthodox church, shared a…

Words 1697 - Pages 7

Why did Tsarist regime collapsed un 1917 Essay

in 1917? The fundamental reasons for the outburst of the Russian Revolutions in1917, which take us back to 1905, are vast and diverse. For centuries,oppressive and autovratic tsars ruled the country, while most of the Russiancitizens managed to survive under dreadful economic and social conditions.Several political movements, which were created during the 19th and early20th century, aimed at dethrowing the repressive Tsar, Nicholas the II. Theembarrassing string of defeats in the Russo-Japanese war…

Words 639 - Pages 3

Peter The Great Imperialism

chauvinistic support that it received from its military prowess. The Russian Empire starts with Peter the I, who paved the way for the Russian Tsar’s having absolute authority that was tolerated due to the continued success of their military conquests. Peter desired for Russia to gain access to the Baltic Sea as this would connect the empire to the rest of Europe and thus legitimize it as a European power (Wikipedia contributors, Russian Empire). As such, he waged war against a weakened Swedish Empire…

Words 2154 - Pages 9