Tsars: Tsar Nicholas Essay

Submitted By Daisy_2001

Words: 392

Pages: 2

Open Document

Was the Russian Revolution the Tsar’s fault?
In this essay, I will decide whether the Russian Revolution was entirely the Tsars fault, I will give reasons from both sides, with supporting evidence, write a conclusion and decide whether the Russian Revolution was the Tsars fault. The Tsar was a wealthy man, who ruled Russia between 1884 and 1917, He was not a good ruler.He lost an easy battle against Japan, he was also behind on what was happening.He didn’t bring the army back and was unprepared when the First world war started. After a small rebellion in 1905 Tsar Nicholas II created a kind of parliament called the Duma.
But the tsar himself was not willing to give up his power and he dissolved the Duma after a few months. Although, the Tsar did some good things for Russia, his reign was known as the Silver age because of cultural prosperity. He began industrialization Russia. Under his reign the
TransSiberian railway was completed which was very important for Russia. They needed it to transport troops,supplies,resources , etc. The Tsar was untruthful, and at one point in his reign left his wife, alone in the palace, with an untrustworthy man called Rasputin, who was a peasant and a womanizer!
It is said that the Tsarina had an affair while the Tsar was away. As Rasputin couldn't leave the Tsar's son alone, Rasputin was practically running the country alongside the Tsar, this meant that the monarchs were being ignored. On the other hand, The

Essay about Tsar: Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Nicholas

opposed nationalism because they were multi-ethnic. The Tsar of Russia was Nicholas II, who was married to Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna. Tsar had many challenges towards his power that have happened throughout history including protests. Tsar depended on his army to keep his power. The Tsarist government of Russia faced serious dangers from 1900 to the outbreak of war in 1914 because of the citizens unrest, the political influences that challenged Tsar, and economic unrest in Russia which came from wars…

Words 707 - Pages 3

Tsar Nicholas II Dbq

The political grievances that were rampant during the reign of Tsar Nicholas II were most definitely big contributors to the opposition towards the Romanovs in the time period up to 1905. Tsar Nicholas II was hellbent on continuing autocratic rule because he truly believed that a monarch’s authority was derived from God, and therefore he could not be held accountable to mortal authority such as parliament. This further supports the point that this did in fact contribute to the opposition towards…

Words 245 - Pages 1

Nicholas Ii of Russia and Tsar Essay

Written by Tsar Nicholas himself, Source B showcases an extract from the October Manifesto, implemented in the year 1905. It outlines both the rules and changes the Tsar promised to enforce within that year. With the perspective of the source being from Tsar Nicholas, it hence proves to have a more bias and persuasive perspective. Being from the person directly linked to the source, it seeks to persuade the reader of the changes for the future whilst also providing factual information. Source B is…

Words 364 - Pages 2

Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper

The authority of the Tsar Nicholas II was heavily undermined after the revolution of 1905 and more directly in the event of Bloody Sunday (9 January 1905). Widespread strikes and uprisings caused by the outraged public created a threat for the Tsar which he could not ignore. Cartoon published in1905 titled „Death stalks the barricades” [appendix + przypis] presents a figure of a giant skeleton passing through the streets of St. Petersburg causing devastation. The figure appears to be unstoppable…

Words 279 - Pages 2

Tsar Nicholas II: The Russian Revolution

certain things became affected. The Russian government started as a Monarchy, which was ruled by the Tsar. The Tsar in control at the time was Tsar Nicholas II. Many things occurred under his rule that led to the revolution. Many of the causes were during World War 1, one big reason was that Russia was very behind with technology, and had very few supplies to fight the war with. And on top of that the Tsar himself took complete control of the military. This contributed to them losing 2 million men during…

Words 556 - Pages 3

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? Essay

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? 1917 saw the February revolution, the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the end of 300 years of Romanov rule and centuries of a Tsarist regime ruling Russia. The reasons why Nicholas II was forced to abdicate can be explained in terms of beliefs, such as Nicholas II belief in autocracy, circumstances, such as world war one, and actions, such as Nicholas’ decision to take direct control of the armed forces. In this essay I will be arguing that circumstances…

Words 1449 - Pages 6

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

turn of the twentieth century saw Tsar Nicholas' reign over Russia from the years of 1894-1917 fall at the hands of the Romanovs, causing the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. There were numerous factors that contributed to the decline of the autocracy, led by Tsar Nicholas II. Nicholas' resistance to creating change caused many problems for Russian society. The Tsar refused to take advice from others as he believed it posed a threat to his authority, which the Tsar feared to a great extent. The October…

Words 821 - Pages 4

Tsar Essay

Tsar Nicholas II The Tsar crowned as supreme ruler of Russia was in need of a new face, so in 1894 a new Tsar was crowned. Nicholas II became the new Tsar of Russia and was praised by many peasants upon his crowning, often referred to as ‘The Little Father of Russia’ he was seen as the saviour of the country but later throughout his reign he would be seen as a weak leader and a failure to the people. His upbringing would cause him to not agree with the necessary change and reform that the people…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

Hadji Murat Essay

tale of resistance, and a window into not only the Caucasian War of the mid-nineteenth century, but also the culture of the Russian Empire during this period. As a work of fiction the reader must be wary of depictions of actual persons such as Tsar Nicholas I, whom Tolstoy was not enamored with, to say the least, but many insights about the period and its people can be gleaned from the story. The novel is one of great contrasts between Chechens and Russians and also of what life was like during this…

Words 1764 - Pages 8

Nicolas Ii Downfall Oct Halfterm Essay

1 December y How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall? Tsar Nicholas was to a great extent responsible for his own downfall, the main factor being his decision to take over as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces during World War One. Russia was economically and socially ill-prepared for war and the effects and the outcome of the war had a devastating impact upon the Russian people. There had been a continual build-up of discontent towards the Tsar as a result of Russia’s failure…

Words 2710 - Pages 11