Cases on Merit Pay In Scheelhaase v. Woodbury Cent. Comm. Sch. District (1973), a veteran teacher was dismissed due to low test scores on the basic skills assessment. The educator argued that her due process rights were violated due to the school misusing student scores. Initially, the trail court ruled in favor of the teacher because student ratings should not be the only method used to measure teacher success in the classroom (Pullin, 2013). However, the trail court ruling was reversed by the…
Words 776 - Pages 4
A) The constitution contains two due process clauses due to Federalism, guaranteeing both federal and state governments always take individuals' natural rights into account. Federalism is a government principle that appropriately divides the power between the national and state governments. The Fifth Amendment’s due process clause explains how the federal government respects fundamental rights, while the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause ensures the protection of fundamental rights from infringement…
Words 303 - Pages 2
Korematsu v. United states was a case appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and documented under the citation 323 U.S 214. The case revolved around the petitioner, Fred Korematsu, submitting a civil suit against the United States for the internment of Japanese peoples. This included citizens who traveled and natural born citizens. The order came from President Franklin D. Roosevelt under the Executive order 9066. This was done during a time where the Japanese were seen as a…
Words 548 - Pages 3
Participation in Government Goss vs. Lopez Braxton Hawkins Ms. Tomlin Due Date: November 25, 2014 Facts of the Case "Nine students at two high schools and one junior high school in Columbus, Ohio, were given 10-day suspensions from school. The school principals did not hold hearings for the affected students before ordering the suspensions, and Ohio law did not require them to do so. Lopez filed suit against the Columbus Board of Education. The principals' actions were challenged…
Words 467 - Pages 2
Case 3 assignment 1 This case is between NCAA and Tarkanian. Jerry tarkanian was hired as the head coach of UNLN means basketball team in 1993. The team that was given to him was subpar and in 3 years he has turned his program. Petitioner NCAA, argued on October 5, 1988 after a lengthy investigation pf allegedly improper recruiting practices by the university of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLY), a state university, the committee found 38 violations, including 10 by respondents Tarkanian UNLV’s basketball…
Words 445 - Pages 2
States appealing from the charge of homicide by intoxication with .1% or more of alcohol level in their blood system and with the use of a motor vehicle and homicide by driving a car with the violation of § 940.09(1), STATS. On the facts on this case it shows how incident involved a car rollover accident on the Highway N in the Town of Presto, Trempealeau County. It shows how the officer that arrive at the scene where it found Julie Murray and Greenwold where the officer spoke first with the owner…
Words 571 - Pages 3
Gideon’s Trumpet Critique #1 Christopher Cheung Law 301 Professor: Dr. D. Jones-Brown, J.D., Ph.D. February 25, 2013 Abstract The famous story Gideon Trumpet and his court case of Gideon vs. Wainwright. Clarence Earl Gideon was accused of breaking and entering a pool room with the intent to commit a misdemeanor, and petty larceny, claimed to have stolen some wine, beer, cigarettes, coca cola, and change from the register. When the pool hall was robbed, Henry cook the man standing…
Words 1780 - Pages 8
For my reaction paper, I will be covering the Supreme Court Case Loving v. Virginia. The Appellant of the case is Richard Loving and the Appellee is the State of Virginia. Richard Loving is a a white man who married Mildred Jeter, a black woman in DC. They resided in Virginia but traveled to DC to get married legally. After acquiring the marriage certificate, they moved back to Virginia. However, the state of Virginia enacted laws that labeled interracial marriages as a felony. It was their antimiscegenation…
Words 1136 - Pages 5
1. Why did the police actions violate Rochin’s due process? According to the book due process guarantees fair procedures for deciding cases. The Bill of Rights lists multiple of the fair procedures. The biggest amendment in the Bill of Rights about due process is the fifth. It states that “no person shall be denied life, liberty, or property without due process of law”. The police violated Rochin’s due process because they entered his home illegally. Not only did they enter his home illegally but…
Words 153 - Pages 1
Relevant amendments involved in this case are the first and fourteenth amendment. Section one of the fourteenth amendment contains the due process clause, this clause makes it unlawful for local and state governments to discriminate against people. In this case, the SMMAMC leader, and his seven members, may use this amendment in their appeal. The SMMAMC leader can argue that the police, a form of local government, discriminated against him due to his veteran status. This would mean that the local government has violated Patrick…
Words 1301 - Pages 6