Wealth Inequality In Canada

Words: 672
Pages: 3

In “Two richest Canadians as wealthy as poorest 30 percent”(2017) Nicole Thompson explained that the impact of wealth inequality can spread to other parts of society, and a society that experiencing many inequalities is not economically sustainable. As an alternative to that, it proposed to increase the proportion of government spending on public services and social security, and the progressive taxation of those who earn a lot of income. Assuming that a person with superior ability in capitalist society receives more money, what happens to someone who has little ability or is born with a physical or mental disability? Can they have nothing? The capitalist system has caused great economic growth in many countries because it can be rewarded according to the will of the individual, but the disadvantage of not …show more content…
With the accumulation of resources, thier children are educated a lot, and then their children become the owner of outstanding academic ability and ability, and they start to have a better life than others. On the other hand, children in poor families receive only basic compulsory education in the country. This is not to say that it is wrong, but that the policy for the lower income class should be the priority of the national policy. According to Nicole (2017) “It also suggested raising the proportion of government spending on public services and social protection.” Also, the auther suggested increasing the proportion of government public services and social security to solve the problem of wealth inequality. A recent study from governments in Ontario and Quebec shows that “Basic income is universal, unconditional and individual. That means every individual in society automatically receives a monthly payment” (Jonathan, 2016). In addition, basic government services to low-income people are supported by Canadians. People with higher incomes live better and those with lower incomes become less able to live,