Why Is Civil Disobedience Effective

Words: 777

Pages: 4

Open Document

In the Constitution it clearly states that the people are in charge of the United States of America. So why do the people have to protest to get the government to change things? Although people may say civil disobedience is not the correct manner of getting things changed, it is still very effective. Civil Disobedience has helped improve the world by giving people equal rights; therefore, it is a very effective agent of change. The Boston Tea Party lead to rebellion against Great Britain, which eventually lead to the creation of the United States of America. Back when the first colonies were still a part of Britain, the colonists were treated unfairly. Britain had a lot of tea and they needed money, so they decided to over-tax the colonists on their tea. The colonists tried to tell Britain that it was not fair for them to do that, but they refused to listen. The colonists then decided to throw the Boston Tea Party, …show more content…
You may think that if other people are breaking the law then why can’t you? Civil disobedience is more than just breaking the law so that you can get what you want. Civil disobedience is only used because the government is not doing its job of letting the people rule. If the government would listen in the first place then there wouldn’t be boycotts or protests. You have to be willing to take the consequences if you choose to break the law. Martin Luther King and Gandhi didn’t get away with all the boycotts and marches without going to jail a couple of times. They went willingly to jail because they had to accept their consequences. Dr. King said, “One who breaks a law must do so with a willingness to accept the penalty.” This means that if you commit a crime knowingly, you must be willing to accept the price for your actions. Civil disobedience is not a first option. People only do it when the government is not doing its job, and does not change what needs to be

Hamburabi's Code Of Civil Disobedience

As quoted by Martin Luther King Jr., an infamous civil rights activist and reverend, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Throughout human history, several laws, orders, and social rules have been put in place to keep people in line and prevent chaos and violence. Ancient codes, such as the Code of Ur-Nammu and Hammburabi’s code, were written thousands of years ago with the noble goal of having people act appropriately and not harm others or do other harmful or obscene acts (Mark)…

Words 2195 - Pages 9

Civil Disobedience In The United States

Civil Disobedience In recent history, people have gathered and disobeyed for change. One of the biggest changes in the U.S. was in the 1950s and 60s, which involved a form of nonviolent resistance. Civil disobedience is important to prevent government control and ensure freedom. Another reason civil disobedience is important is not everyone shares the same opinions on laws and will disobey laws they disagree with. If people comply with what is told to them and never resist, they would slowly have…

Words 524 - Pages 3

The Justness Of Civil Disobedience

Civil disobedience is nonviolent resistance manifested by an active, perceived refusal to obey certain laws or commands of a government. It involves the symbolic violation of a particular law and not a rejection of an entire system. Individuals that engage in civil disobedience often than not found themselves on the wrong end of the law. It is because, those in power feel threatened by such acts and feel the need to enforce the law at all cost. It has led to the branding of a civil disobedient individual…

Words 1220 - Pages 5

Why We Should Not Obey A Given Law

act as his own legislator, and to decide that he will or will not obey a given law? In the first place, dramatic disobedience to the law by a minority may be the only effective way of catching the attention or winning the support of the majority Most classic cases of civil disobedience, from the early Christians to Gandhi and his supporters, exemplify this truth. Civil disobedience, like almost no other technique, can shame a majority and make it ask itself just how far it is willing to go, just…

Words 524 - Pages 3

Civil Disobedience And Loyalty

Historically and culturally we have seen humans wrestle with the concept of civil disobedience and what such an idea entails. For some, civil disobedience is always a nonviolent, public display of a person and or group refusing to obey certain laws and commands recognized by a government or power structure. For others, civil disobedience can consist of violent acts when warranted. Nevertheless, the concepts of civil disobedience have been around for a while, with many contributing to it’s growth. For…

Words 910 - Pages 4

Civic Engagement Definition

include: civil disobedience, the strategies to overcome voting difficulties for minorities, boycotts affecting the economy, and…

Words 1889 - Pages 8

Black Lives Matter Movement Analysis

segregation, verbal protest does not lead to justice because there still seems to be a hierarchy between the blacks and the whites; throughout my essay you will see arguments about – The Black Lives Matter Movement, equal rights within labor, and civil disobedience. According to the article, "The strategy of protest: problems of negro civic action" by James Q. Wilson, stated “The second party opposes the realization of that goal, but has nothing which the…

Words 1189 - Pages 5

National Walkout Day Research Paper

are peacefully standing up for what the believe in. Imagine those people who are being beaten and harassed, not fighting back. That is what civil disobedience is. Some may say that civil disobedience is not effective and that it is just a waste of time while others believe it is a valid way to protest against a higher power. I believe that civil disobedience is an efficient method of social change. This practice gives the opportunity of self expression, allows citizens to draw attention to the issue…

Words 1464 - Pages 6

Rhetorical Devices In Mlk Letter From Birmingham Jail

While in jail, Martin Luther King wrote a letter confronting criticism written by the clergyman. The clergyman was telling King not to protest, but King led a protest and was put in jail because he did not have a permit. The clergyman said he was "unwise and untimely." While writing his letter, Martin Luther King used rhetorical devices to develop his argument, that his visit to Birmingham was not unwise and untimely. In the criticism written by clergymen, they said that, Dr. King is an outsider…

Words 856 - Pages 4

Thoreau Vs Krauker

the message convey itself and does it merit its worth to the audience? Why does it stand out amongst the others? In the works of Thoreau and Krauker, authors who have cultivated the art of writing about the outdoors, how have they both reinforced their claims? Krauker’s non-fiction book Into the Wild and Thoreau’s essay Civil Disobedience. When both compared, which of their arguments stands above the others? Good and effective arguments are constructed from the foundation…

Words 2477 - Pages 10