Essay about 12 Angry Men Analysis

Submitted By jazminalfaro

Words: 321

Pages: 2

Open Document

Jazmin Alfaro
Mrs. Danelle Taylor-Johnston
English Communications-2
20 November 2014
12 Angry Men Analysis When I first started watching 12 Angry Men, I was dreading it because I was expecting it to be boring but it was the opposite. I am quite sure that the movie was one of the best movies I have seen at school. The juror I was assigned to was #1, who was a timid little man. In the beginning, I noticed that #1 voted the boy guilty because he wanted to to leave the jury, especially since it was the hottest day of the year. As the movie continues, #1 starts to smoke a pipe as if to ease his nerves. I observed that he was nervous because when it was his turn to speak, he stuttered quite a bit. While the discussion continues, #1 starts to waver on his previous conviction of the boy being guilty. At the third vote, he changed his vote to not guilty. Progressively, every one stated their point and #1 starts to get comfortable and offers everyone a cough drop. He starts to defend the boy and he opens up and states his observations. When almost half of the people changed their vote to not guilty, #1 says that he thinks the debate should be extended because the evidence is too high and he gets so defensive to the point where he stands up to the temperamental man. Afterwards everyone changes their vote and the case is closed. At first, #1's motivation was to leave quickly, but as time passed his motivation was the fact that he wanted everyone to give the boy a fair chance. When

Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

c. Closed ended questions: Yes/no format questions 11. OJ Simpson case: 294-item quesitonaire. Black more likely to side with defendant, held in area with mostly black. Defandants showed that there was reasonable doubt in DNA evidence 12. Belief in a just world: Person who belives in this needs explanation and justification, they’re threatened by the possibility hthat events happen by chance. d. Will berate the victim of a crime or be tougher on the defendant 13. Jury consultant:…

Words 539 - Pages 3

12 Angry Men Power Analysis

POWER Power is a tone that shows throughout the film. It expresses itself in almost every scene. In majority it is the fight and abuse of power between the Warden/Guards versing the Inmates/Andy Dufresne. Power adds effect to the overall production of the film, by adding emotion (pity) for the inmates, as well as additionally adding hatred towards the warden and guards at their total corrupt and abuse of their authoritative power. ________________________________________________________________________________…

Words 760 - Pages 4

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

Many factors play into persuading the decision of the jurors involved in making the final say in a jury deliberation group. There are many techniques that are involved and used by the different jurors as they have all been through different experiences and have different lifestyles. An example of a difference in people they are, one is very racist and pokes fun at the living conditions of the son, whereas another juror feels for the boy as he also grew up in the slums. With these different experiences…

Words 889 - Pages 4

12 Angry Men Poem Analysis

Democracy is government by the people. In the drama of Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and the poem “Democracy” Langston Hughes the talk about democracy. The authors convey their perspectives on democracy. Although there perspectives are similar, their opinions do differ. Rose perspective on democracy and inequality, based on the depictions of each character, is that everyone is equal. That everyone has their own opinion, and their own right to vote based on that opinion; To be ruled by the people…

Words 661 - Pages 3

12 Angry Men Quotes Analysis

not. When making a decision that will determine someone’s future, one cannot ignore something that does not feel correct. One would agree with this quote because one misleading detail can alter the decision that will change someone’s life. Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose supports this quote when the jurors conclude that the old man could not have heard or seen the boy, the wound could…

Words 1748 - Pages 7

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

Many of the jurors got heated and got into arguments with other jurors and what juror twelve said and how he reacted to the situation affected how the outcome of the situation ended. For example going back to when juror twelve redirected the conversation from everyone yelling at juror eight at once to his idea of let everyone say what they want one at a time so juror eight doesn’t feel bombarded with all the people talking at once. All the jurors agree that this idea is very fair and the foreman…

Words 182 - Pages 1

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

How would you feel if you were wrongfully convicted of your own father's murder by a group of ill-tempered jurors? a rhetorical question. In Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, a young man was put on trial for supposedly stabbing his father, and a group of twelve jurors were selected to dive deeper into the case and come up with a verdict. Before any ideas of doubt came up, most of the group believed the boy was guilty and it was almost impossible for them to come to a unanimous decision. After hours…

Words 354 - Pages 2

12 Angry Men Jury Analysis

Jurors see the trial from the eyes of a viewer viewing a debate contest. Often, viewers viewing a debate contest choose the team that is presenting their previous views and beliefs. Viewers often stick with their teams throughout. Jurors watch a trial, and focus on which eye witnesses are more truthful and which expert witnesses have more expertise or are more accurate, to choose their team and stick with it throughout. Eye witness testimony is important to jurors. Team players, including witnesses…

Words 1789 - Pages 8

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

Performing impartiality through speech may not sound like a performance at all, but the emphasis on using hypotheticals in the voir dire requires jurors and lawyers to speak as if action is taking place. Although this may not always uncover all of the biases a juror may have, it is a far better tool than directly questioning a juror about their impartiality. Similarly, these hypotheticals allow the attorney’s questioning to last longer and appear more thorough, a performance of their commitment to…

Words 954 - Pages 4

Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

When juror number eight stands up to the other jurors and votes not guilty, the other men get upset with him. Additionally, these men try and pressure him into changing his vote, by trying to make him feel foolish for suggesting such an idea. This leads juror number eight to call for a recount, one in which he will abstain from. If it wasn’t for juror number nine changing his vote to not guilty, the group for the second time would have succumbed to the groupthink process. Juror number eight and nine’s…

Words 177 - Pages 1