12 Angry Men Jury Analysis

Words: 1789

Pages: 8

Open Document

Jurors see the trial from the eyes of a viewer viewing a debate contest. Often, viewers viewing a debate contest choose the team that is presenting their previous views and beliefs. Viewers often stick with their teams throughout. Jurors watch a trial, and focus on which eye witnesses are more truthful and which expert witnesses have more expertise or are more accurate, to choose their team and stick with it throughout. Eye witness testimony is important to jurors. Team players, including witnesses could cause you to win or lose a case, because jurors evaluate witness testimony and witness honesty. When jurors trust an expert witness or an eye witness, his team is likely to win. Cross-examining any witness whom the viewers trust is a risky endeavor, because the viewer may increase their belief in the …show more content…
At Wild’s trial for accomplice in crime his defense attorney says, “he underwent ‘rigorous and demeaning cross examination on the part of Christina Gutierrez.’” His cross-examination was unfair, and therefore he should be given a lighter punishment. Wilds in the end does not have to go to jail. Each piece of evidence helps, especially if the judge listened to any of the court records, it may have arouse sympathy for Wilds because of Gutierrez’s aggressive tone as we hear in the recording in Serial. This may have saved Wilds from going into jail.
Therefore, jurors may not be the best people to decide whether or not someone is guilty; there should be experts who make the decision. The detectives should come down and testify, and the experts should ensure that the different stories match up and whether the mistakes are careless or standard. If experts find him innocent they should give some guidance as how to find the true criminal. It is dangerous to have a potential murderer running around, even if he might be innocent, so he must be caught

Essay about 12 Angry Men Analysis

Taylor-Johnston English Communications-2 20 November 2014 12 Angry Men Analysis When I first started watching 12 Angry Men, I was dreading it because I was expecting it to be boring but it was the opposite. I am quite sure that the movie was one of the best movies I have seen at school. The juror I was assigned to was #1, who was a timid little man. In the beginning, I noticed that #1 voted the boy guilty because he wanted to to leave the jury, especially since it was the hottest day of the year. As…

Words 321 - Pages 2

Explain How the Votes of Jurors Are Changed Via the Notion If Reasonable Doubt Essay

In the play 12 angry men written by Reginald Rose , Juror 8 creatively induces reasonable doubt into the minds of the other jurors by going into the evidence in more detail. He insightfully deconstructs every minute detail in the case and gradually convinces the jurors that it is possible that he may be innocent. 11 of the jurors had voted guilty initially, either because of the facts on the surface of the case or in the case of jurors 3, 7 and 10 personal prejudices or the need to get out of the…

Words 960 - Pages 4

Jury Deliberation In 12 Angry Men

Within the jury deliberation process, there are three stages. The first stage, orientation, is when the jury foreperson is elected and when general procedures are discussed (Costanzo & Krauss, 2018). Within the film “12 Angry Men” the jury foreman begins the orientation phase by describing the nature of the trial as well as potential sentencing outcomes (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). The jury foreman further explains that their verdict must be unanimous (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Following the explanation by…

Words 1061 - Pages 5

Group Discourse Analysis

consistent with a countries constitution (Parks) much similar to the scenario in the play or film 12 Angry Men that follows a group for jurors through their decision making process. In order to continue this paper and conduct discourse analysis on it is essential that, it is verified that the board of jurors in the…

Words 1359 - Pages 6

Essay Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men”

Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men” Olu Adewumi NCLC 375: Prof. Ampthor The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is about twelve male jurors, brought together in a deliberation room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The deliberation starts with an 11-1 vote for guilty. As the movie progresses, the one man who had a reasonable doubt about the guilt or innocent of the young boy, convinces the other members…

Words 2842 - Pages 12

Essay on Verdict and Influence Tactics

Week 2 Assignment “12 Angry Men” Analysis HRMG6200 Jonathan Ortiz September 6, 2014 1. Find examples for 5 of the 8 influence techniques. Pressure influence tactics can be immediately seen from the very first scene and is constant throughout the entire film. This influence tactic is the most evident form of influence utilized in the film. During the initial voting session, eleven of the twelve jurors were left in shock when only one juror voted against the majority vote as he voted not guilty…

Words 1099 - Pages 5

MGT204 Final Paper

Group dynamics analysis What are group dynamics? Group dynamics is a system of behaviors and psychological processes occurring within a social group. When we built our first group, we really didn’t know how to start it, so we decided to follow group building process, first of all, know our team, so we decided to use some team building activities to help us get to know each other, building trust, facilitating communication and teamwork.After we introduced ourselves to each other in our first meeting…

Words 2484 - Pages 10

Criminology Notes Essay

witch burnings were a way to control women/women’s bodies -peasant rebellion seen as enemies of god -men encouraged to beat their wives -guilt and sin were now apart of Christian lives -14th century the end of the world arrived in the form of the black plague, gods punishment for sin, people turned to village wise women for comfort and healing, women pop. increased, women begin to outlive men, women do not find husbands and become independent, this is not good for a patriarchal society -just…

Words 8665 - Pages 35

Socrates, Philosophy and the Good Life Essay

physical things that did not matter. During his trial he reminds his fellow Athenians, "I have tried to persuade each of you not to care for any of his possessions rather than care for himself, striving for the utmost excellence and understanding."12 Socrates believed that to have a "good life" you needed to have a true understanding of knowledge. Socrates strongly believed one must examine the innermost beings of one's life because "an unexamined life is no life for a human being to live."13…

Words 2627 - Pages 11

Psychology and Answers Essay

Which of the following is not a true statement about creativity? D) You have to have superior intelligence to be creative 11. Which best represents the manipulation of mental representations as used in the information-processing model? D) thinking 12. In a bell shaped curve A) all of these answers B) half the scores are higher than 100 C) the average IQ for any age groups is 100 D) about 16% of the scores of any age group fall below 84 | | | | | The capacity to produce an original…

Words 4678 - Pages 19