In reference to Jackson’s Bank Veto Message to Congress (K), it states that more than a fourth part of the stock is held by foreigners and the (rest) is held by a few hundred of our own citizens, chiefly of the richest class.” With this in mind, Jackson’s argument was that the bank does not benefit the majority of the citizens and is controlled by foreign entities and rich citizens which could have an affect on policies, regulations and trade deals that will most likely benefit the rich and hurt the working class that can’t even be heard and don't have a voice. The argument might arise from Daniel Webster’s Reply to Jackson’s Bank Veto Message (L) that “ It raises a cry that liberty is in danger, at the very moment when it puts forth claims to powers heretofore unknown and unheard of…. It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich.” In response to the claim that liberty is in danger, it is actually in even more danger if we have foreign countries and governments having a share in our national