Arguments Against Animal Testing

Words: 438
Pages: 2
Open Document
Animals used for testing Diana Enriquez and Byrri Ramos

Don’t use animals for testing find something else to use! There should be better ways for people to testing beauty products on animals. The animals shouldn’t have to suffer for humans. Animals shouldn’t be use to test products because animals can get harmed, there are better ways to test products, and it’s cruel to animals. The animals can get harmed during the testing. For example, “Rats, mice, rabbits and guinea pigs are the most commonly used species in product testing. Rabbits are used most extensively in eye irritancy tests because their eyes are large.”(National Anti-vivisection Society ). This demonstrates that animals get harmed by using their body parts to test products. …show more content…
According to the article, “While the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act requires animal testing for pharmaceutical drugs and other chemical compounds that change the structure and func­tion of the human body, it does not specifically require animal testing on cosmetics.”(National Anti-vivisection Society ). This shows that cosmetic products don’t need animals to be tested on to make the products safe. Testing on animals is painful to them if the product doesn’t turn out right.

Testing any type of products on animal is very painful for them. For example, “U.S. law allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged.”(Peta.org ). This demonstrates that testing products on animals is very cruel because the testing causes pain and burning. This means animals also suffer a lot with products being tested on them. On the other hand, people might argue that the products aren’t being tested on humans. Like it is stated in the article, “ In some cases, after considering available alternatives, companies may determine that animal testing is necessary to assure the safety of a product or ingredient.”(National Anti-vivisection Society ).This shows that the products aren’t tested on people so it is safer for the people who try it on. The products get tested on the animals instead of people trying them for the first
Show More

Related Documents: Arguments Against Animal Testing

Argument Against Animal Testing

In my opinion, I feel as if there is no point to animal testing. Testing on animals is kind of the same as testing on human beings. We are not much of a difference beside that fact that humans walk on two legs and animals walk on four, and we talk rather than an unknown language and we also wear clothes to cover up while they wear their very own fur. Researchers think that just because of these differences between us and animals that it is okay to test on them for our very own selfishness. We say…

Words 586 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

In hopes of progressing in medical and psychological advancements, eliminating animal testing, and possibly space exploration, my team has come up with G.E.D.S. A form of artificial intelligence with motor skills, the ability to communicate, voice recognition, sensory/organ replication, and psychological status detection. In our modern day world, unethical human experimentation is illegal. And while it is in everyone’s interest, further progress is delayed. But what if there was a moral way to test…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

your heart in a split second? Well that's as long as it takes for a animal to die for testing of medicine and poisoning . Now rethink do you really want innocent animals testing on and they don't have a say in it? scientists and researchers for cosmetics are killing and torturing innocent animals for human products. First of all animals should not be used for testing . For example, it states in the book animal testing :“The violations include the deaths of two primates that became dehydrated…

Words 474 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

It is estimated that around “26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon). These millions of animals are cruelly utilized in a variety of different testing methods. Animal testing is defined as the use of any nonhuman primate mammal for research (ProCon). For many years, animal testing including rabbits, monkeys, rats, mice, hamsters, dogs, cats etc. has been used to test different products, to improve research, and to experiment on.…

Words 278 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

lives and consider them as one of the family members. To know that in America many animals are being used for testing is heart wrenching. There are an estimated 115 million animals that are used every year for commercial and scientific testing worldwide (“About Animal Testing”). Supporters of animal testing argue that these tests have allowed for the development of a number of life-saving treatments for humans and animals as well. They claim that there is no substitute for researching on a complete living…

Words 1644 - Pages 7

Argument Against Animal Testing

these cures and processes are developed? They are partly developed through animal testing. Animal testing is a good way to help test substances and processes before humans use them. Human lives matter more than an animal's life. People eat meat like beef, pork, lamb, etc for food, so why do we care that animals are being used to help people and other animals with diseases and other problems? In a year 100 million animals are tested on and killed for the advancement and the protection of science…

Words 543 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Beginning circa 500 BCE, animals have been used countless times throughout history as test subjects for biomedical research. Animals testing refers to the procedures carried out on living animals with the purpose to expand biological understanding. Presently, the majority of animal testing is utilized to verify the toxicity and safety of products that are destined for human use, such as pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. A wide range of animals are used in experimentation, such as Dogs, Cats, Guinea…

Words 1178 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are like us.’ Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals and the answer is: “Because they are not like us’. Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction’”. Each year over 100 million animals die in laboratories in the United States (Peta). These deaths alone are just happening in the United States. These innocent animals die because of all kinds of testing and experimentations done on them. Animal cruelty…

Words 1224 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

While some may argue that animal testing is relevant, and helps people. It is more true that it actually does do a significant change, it helps cure only some diseases (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this reason is less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are seen in animals. Over 98% never affect animals (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this, is that some medications that are for everyday use, could be toxic to animals. Some animals are sometimes found swallowing pills that are left on the ground…

Words 625 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

I. Many people are against animal testing in laboratories. It is often considered unethical, cruel, and unnecessary. A. A study was done on multiple people to discover their feelings towards using animals to test various products and chemicals. B. There was two factors shown in this study: general attitudes towards animal testing and animal welfare in testing conditions. 1. The study showed that overall people were okay with animal testing, as long as they were being tested in clean…

Words 389 - Pages 2