Arguments Against Animal Testing

Words: 1644
Pages: 7
Open Document
Many of us have grown up having pets all of our lives, whether it was a dog, cat, gerbil, horse, snake, or a lizard. These pets have become a part of our lives and consider them as one of the family members. To know that in America many animals are being used for testing is heart wrenching. There are an estimated 115 million animals that are used every year for commercial and scientific testing worldwide (“About Animal Testing”). Supporters of animal testing argue that these tests have allowed for the development of a number of life-saving treatments for humans and animals as well. They claim that there is no substitute for researching on a complete living organism (Procon.org). Yet, would they want their family pets to be treated the way that …show more content…
They are going to argue that animal testing donates to countless life-saving treatments and cures, that there is no suitable substitute to testing on living, whole-body systems, that animals tend to make for better research subjects than human beings due to their life cycles that are shorter, and that animals must be used for testing of medicines in order to prevent potential toxicity in humans and to protect humans. These individuals don’t realize that there are other options out there for animal testing and that it is cruel and inhumane to be testing on animals and for the animals to suffer. There have been new alternative methods that are able to replace the need for testing on animals, medical treatments developed in animals rarely translates to humans, and these drugs that pass and are safe for animals doesn’t automatically mean that it safe for human beings. If the United States and other countries passed stricter laws on animal testing these animals would no longer have to suffer and give their lives to the laboratories. These animals have no voice and no way of refusing the torture that they are subject to. If testing needs to be done, then it should be done on humans that volunteer their lives and bodies to science and can understand the situation that they are putting themselves in; not on innocent animals especially when the research shows that the testing isn’t always
Show More

Related Documents: Arguments Against Animal Testing

Argument Against Animal Testing

In my opinion, I feel as if there is no point to animal testing. Testing on animals is kind of the same as testing on human beings. We are not much of a difference beside that fact that humans walk on two legs and animals walk on four, and we talk rather than an unknown language and we also wear clothes to cover up while they wear their very own fur. Researchers think that just because of these differences between us and animals that it is okay to test on them for our very own selfishness. We say…

Words 586 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

In hopes of progressing in medical and psychological advancements, eliminating animal testing, and possibly space exploration, my team has come up with G.E.D.S. A form of artificial intelligence with motor skills, the ability to communicate, voice recognition, sensory/organ replication, and psychological status detection. In our modern day world, unethical human experimentation is illegal. And while it is in everyone’s interest, further progress is delayed. But what if there was a moral way to test…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

your heart in a split second? Well that's as long as it takes for a animal to die for testing of medicine and poisoning . Now rethink do you really want innocent animals testing on and they don't have a say in it? scientists and researchers for cosmetics are killing and torturing innocent animals for human products. First of all animals should not be used for testing . For example, it states in the book animal testing :“The violations include the deaths of two primates that became dehydrated…

Words 474 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

It is estimated that around “26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon). These millions of animals are cruelly utilized in a variety of different testing methods. Animal testing is defined as the use of any nonhuman primate mammal for research (ProCon). For many years, animal testing including rabbits, monkeys, rats, mice, hamsters, dogs, cats etc. has been used to test different products, to improve research, and to experiment on.…

Words 278 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Animals used for testing Diana Enriquez and Byrri Ramos Don’t use animals for testing find something else to use! There should be better ways for people to testing beauty products on animals. The animals shouldn’t have to suffer for humans. Animals shouldn’t be use to test products because animals can get harmed, there are better ways to test products, and it’s cruel to animals. The animals can get harmed during the testing. For example, “Rats, mice, rabbits and guinea pigs are the most…

Words 438 - Pages 2

Argument Against Animal Testing

these cures and processes are developed? They are partly developed through animal testing. Animal testing is a good way to help test substances and processes before humans use them. Human lives matter more than an animal's life. People eat meat like beef, pork, lamb, etc for food, so why do we care that animals are being used to help people and other animals with diseases and other problems? In a year 100 million animals are tested on and killed for the advancement and the protection of science…

Words 543 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Beginning circa 500 BCE, animals have been used countless times throughout history as test subjects for biomedical research. Animals testing refers to the procedures carried out on living animals with the purpose to expand biological understanding. Presently, the majority of animal testing is utilized to verify the toxicity and safety of products that are destined for human use, such as pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. A wide range of animals are used in experimentation, such as Dogs, Cats, Guinea…

Words 1178 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are like us.’ Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals and the answer is: “Because they are not like us’. Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction’”. Each year over 100 million animals die in laboratories in the United States (Peta). These deaths alone are just happening in the United States. These innocent animals die because of all kinds of testing and experimentations done on them. Animal cruelty…

Words 1224 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

While some may argue that animal testing is relevant, and helps people. It is more true that it actually does do a significant change, it helps cure only some diseases (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this reason is less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are seen in animals. Over 98% never affect animals (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this, is that some medications that are for everyday use, could be toxic to animals. Some animals are sometimes found swallowing pills that are left on the ground…

Words 625 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

I. Many people are against animal testing in laboratories. It is often considered unethical, cruel, and unnecessary. A. A study was done on multiple people to discover their feelings towards using animals to test various products and chemicals. B. There was two factors shown in this study: general attitudes towards animal testing and animal welfare in testing conditions. 1. The study showed that overall people were okay with animal testing, as long as they were being tested in clean…

Words 389 - Pages 2