Arguments Against Animal Testing

Words: 625

Pages: 3

Open Document

While some may argue that animal testing is relevant, and helps people. It is more true that it actually does do a significant change, it helps cure only some diseases (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this reason is less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are seen in animals. Over 98% never affect animals (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this, is that some medications that are for everyday use, could be toxic to animals. Some animals are sometimes found swallowing pills that are left on the ground. (Peta.com)
Animals that are bound to get tested on, often become lonely, and cower in the corner of the cell they stay in. Whenever someone passes they often think that they are the next victim. Boredom causes some animals to develop neurotic behaviors, letting them bite their own skin, or even hair out (Peta.com).
Medicine that works in humans can be toxic in animals. For example, Ibuprofen, Adderall, Acetaminophen (Tylenol), and Duloxetine (Cymbalta) are all pills that work in humans, but are toxic to animals. Ibuprofen is the most common human medication that is ingested by pets. Adderall doesn’t have the same effect as it does on humans, towards pets, it acts as a stimulant and causes elevation of heart rate and body temperature, and can lead to seizures. Acetaminophen is also one of the most used painkillers, …show more content…
Some even have to die because of dissections in science classrooms, or in biology lessons (Peta.com). 95% of the animals that are tested on, aren’t covered by the AWA (Animal Welfare Act), some are but only with minimal protections, and can go uncounted for (Peta.com). Mice, rats, birds, and cold-blooded animals make up more than 95% of animals used to get tested on (Peta.com). To test cosmetics, and household cleaners, are hundreds of thousands of animals are blinded, poisoned, and even killed by cruel cooperations

Argument Against Animal Testing

In my opinion, I feel as if there is no point to animal testing. Testing on animals is kind of the same as testing on human beings. We are not much of a difference beside that fact that humans walk on two legs and animals walk on four, and we talk rather than an unknown language and we also wear clothes to cover up while they wear their very own fur. Researchers think that just because of these differences between us and animals that it is okay to test on them for our very own selfishness. We say…

Words 586 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

In hopes of progressing in medical and psychological advancements, eliminating animal testing, and possibly space exploration, my team has come up with G.E.D.S. A form of artificial intelligence with motor skills, the ability to communicate, voice recognition, sensory/organ replication, and psychological status detection. In our modern day world, unethical human experimentation is illegal. And while it is in everyone’s interest, further progress is delayed. But what if there was a moral way to test…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

your heart in a split second? Well that's as long as it takes for a animal to die for testing of medicine and poisoning . Now rethink do you really want innocent animals testing on and they don't have a say in it? scientists and researchers for cosmetics are killing and torturing innocent animals for human products. First of all animals should not be used for testing . For example, it states in the book animal testing :“The violations include the deaths of two primates that became dehydrated…

Words 474 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

It is estimated that around “26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon). These millions of animals are cruelly utilized in a variety of different testing methods. Animal testing is defined as the use of any nonhuman primate mammal for research (ProCon). For many years, animal testing including rabbits, monkeys, rats, mice, hamsters, dogs, cats etc. has been used to test different products, to improve research, and to experiment on.…

Words 278 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

lives and consider them as one of the family members. To know that in America many animals are being used for testing is heart wrenching. There are an estimated 115 million animals that are used every year for commercial and scientific testing worldwide (“About Animal Testing”). Supporters of animal testing argue that these tests have allowed for the development of a number of life-saving treatments for humans and animals as well. They claim that there is no substitute for researching on a complete living…

Words 1644 - Pages 7

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Animals used for testing Diana Enriquez and Byrri Ramos Don’t use animals for testing find something else to use! There should be better ways for people to testing beauty products on animals. The animals shouldn’t have to suffer for humans. Animals shouldn’t be use to test products because animals can get harmed, there are better ways to test products, and it’s cruel to animals. The animals can get harmed during the testing. For example, “Rats, mice, rabbits and guinea pigs are the most…

Words 438 - Pages 2

Argument Against Animal Testing

these cures and processes are developed? They are partly developed through animal testing. Animal testing is a good way to help test substances and processes before humans use them. Human lives matter more than an animal's life. People eat meat like beef, pork, lamb, etc for food, so why do we care that animals are being used to help people and other animals with diseases and other problems? In a year 100 million animals are tested on and killed for the advancement and the protection of science…

Words 543 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Beginning circa 500 BCE, animals have been used countless times throughout history as test subjects for biomedical research. Animals testing refers to the procedures carried out on living animals with the purpose to expand biological understanding. Presently, the majority of animal testing is utilized to verify the toxicity and safety of products that are destined for human use, such as pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. A wide range of animals are used in experimentation, such as Dogs, Cats, Guinea…

Words 1178 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are like us.’ Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals and the answer is: “Because they are not like us’. Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction’”. Each year over 100 million animals die in laboratories in the United States (Peta). These deaths alone are just happening in the United States. These innocent animals die because of all kinds of testing and experimentations done on them. Animal cruelty…

Words 1224 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

I. Many people are against animal testing in laboratories. It is often considered unethical, cruel, and unnecessary. A. A study was done on multiple people to discover their feelings towards using animals to test various products and chemicals. B. There was two factors shown in this study: general attitudes towards animal testing and animal welfare in testing conditions. 1. The study showed that overall people were okay with animal testing, as long as they were being tested in clean…

Words 389 - Pages 2