Arguments Against Animal Testing

Words: 540

Pages: 3

Open Document

“The question is not “can they reason?” nor “can they talk?”, but rather, “can they suffer?” said Jeremy Bentham an English philosopher. Animals should not be used in medical or scientific research. They do not have a choice or voice to say no. Although, it has its benefits of helping solve few diseases, it’s not right to abuse them. And also these experiment are very expensive and not they are not used for medical research.
J.Jennings said “Animal studies can neither prove or guarantee the safety of any drug. They are not substitute for testing in humans.” Medical and scientific research in animals are inadequate, they do not have the same diseases that humans have. For example, HIV, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s diseases and many types of cancer. Despite many treatment functioning in animals it does not mean it will necessarily work in humans. Even though there are alternative testing methods now that can replace the need for animals, scientist insist in prolonging the cruelty. The drugs that pass animal test are not necessarily safe for human. Also, animal testing may mislead researchers into ignoring potention cures and treatments. Meaning that animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. …show more content…
It’s unknown how many animal are been used because they not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. Animal experiment are not just used in medical researcher but universities are using it for dissection. The experiment and testing in animal cost an enormous amount of money, money from taxpayers. There are other methods like the in vitro, which does not harm animals and cost less. The Humane Society International has a chart where it shows that in vitro cost less than actually animal testing. For example; a “chromosome aberration cost $30,000 in animal testing, but in vitro it only cost $20,000”(

Argument Against Animal Testing

In my opinion, I feel as if there is no point to animal testing. Testing on animals is kind of the same as testing on human beings. We are not much of a difference beside that fact that humans walk on two legs and animals walk on four, and we talk rather than an unknown language and we also wear clothes to cover up while they wear their very own fur. Researchers think that just because of these differences between us and animals that it is okay to test on them for our very own selfishness. We say…

Words 586 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

In hopes of progressing in medical and psychological advancements, eliminating animal testing, and possibly space exploration, my team has come up with G.E.D.S. A form of artificial intelligence with motor skills, the ability to communicate, voice recognition, sensory/organ replication, and psychological status detection. In our modern day world, unethical human experimentation is illegal. And while it is in everyone’s interest, further progress is delayed. But what if there was a moral way to test…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

your heart in a split second? Well that's as long as it takes for a animal to die for testing of medicine and poisoning . Now rethink do you really want innocent animals testing on and they don't have a say in it? scientists and researchers for cosmetics are killing and torturing innocent animals for human products. First of all animals should not be used for testing . For example, it states in the book animal testing :“The violations include the deaths of two primates that became dehydrated…

Words 474 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

It is estimated that around “26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon). These millions of animals are cruelly utilized in a variety of different testing methods. Animal testing is defined as the use of any nonhuman primate mammal for research (ProCon). For many years, animal testing including rabbits, monkeys, rats, mice, hamsters, dogs, cats etc. has been used to test different products, to improve research, and to experiment on.…

Words 278 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

lives and consider them as one of the family members. To know that in America many animals are being used for testing is heart wrenching. There are an estimated 115 million animals that are used every year for commercial and scientific testing worldwide (“About Animal Testing”). Supporters of animal testing argue that these tests have allowed for the development of a number of life-saving treatments for humans and animals as well. They claim that there is no substitute for researching on a complete living…

Words 1644 - Pages 7

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Animals used for testing Diana Enriquez and Byrri Ramos Don’t use animals for testing find something else to use! There should be better ways for people to testing beauty products on animals. The animals shouldn’t have to suffer for humans. Animals shouldn’t be use to test products because animals can get harmed, there are better ways to test products, and it’s cruel to animals. The animals can get harmed during the testing. For example, “Rats, mice, rabbits and guinea pigs are the most…

Words 438 - Pages 2

Argument Against Animal Testing

these cures and processes are developed? They are partly developed through animal testing. Animal testing is a good way to help test substances and processes before humans use them. Human lives matter more than an animal's life. People eat meat like beef, pork, lamb, etc for food, so why do we care that animals are being used to help people and other animals with diseases and other problems? In a year 100 million animals are tested on and killed for the advancement and the protection of science…

Words 543 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Beginning circa 500 BCE, animals have been used countless times throughout history as test subjects for biomedical research. Animals testing refers to the procedures carried out on living animals with the purpose to expand biological understanding. Presently, the majority of animal testing is utilized to verify the toxicity and safety of products that are destined for human use, such as pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. A wide range of animals are used in experimentation, such as Dogs, Cats, Guinea…

Words 1178 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are like us.’ Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals and the answer is: “Because they are not like us’. Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction’”. Each year over 100 million animals die in laboratories in the United States (Peta). These deaths alone are just happening in the United States. These innocent animals die because of all kinds of testing and experimentations done on them. Animal cruelty…

Words 1224 - Pages 5

Arguments Against Animal Testing

While some may argue that animal testing is relevant, and helps people. It is more true that it actually does do a significant change, it helps cure only some diseases (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this reason is less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are seen in animals. Over 98% never affect animals (Peta.com). Some evidence to prove this, is that some medications that are for everyday use, could be toxic to animals. Some animals are sometimes found swallowing pills that are left on the ground…

Words 625 - Pages 3