Arguments Against Freedom Of Speech

Words: 1400
Pages: 6
Open Document
As “S.G. Tallentyre” once said “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”, everyone has the right to speak and think freely with no constrictions for whatever reason. Freedom of speech is one of the most bedrock principles of our society, even though high percentage of individuals believe in strong free speech rights, it is no secret that the first amendment is a lightning rod for political, social, cultural, environmental, medical physiological controversy. It does not exist in a vacuum and it often subject to intense media scrutiny. To be effective, protection of free speech rights must rise above all these frays with “limits”. I just want you to catch my perspective that it does not mean that I must …show more content…
He perceived the constitution as a document that did nothing to limit rights.
Although I have to be attentive to remember those people in an environment where I deal with cyber-crimes, internet predators, gang violence and other complication of the modern criminals. Yet a free speech issue is indeed much the same as it was over 200 years ago, therefore we examine it in much the same way. If the speech is used to provoke violence or if it is slander, liberal or obscenity then we do have a serious issue. Besides, another serious issue that we’re all facing today is the wrong concept speakers understand and use to express about a specific issue with no …show more content…
Jack M. Balkin is a professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment. The First Amendment ensures the privilege of people and gatherings to take part in culture and to impact each other through participating in culture. Consequently, the First Amendment not only secures political majority rules system, but also secures social vote based system. The privilege to participate in culture is a common and also a political flexibility. Despite the fact that this correct legitimates political is self-administration, it rises above that reason. Social majority rule government, and accordingly social flexibility, which is an essential segment of a free society, even in nations that are not completely popularity based or majority rule by any stretch of the imagination. Additionally, a social hypothesis of free discourse offers a considerably more persuading clarification regarding why an incredible arrangement of articulation that appears to have little to do with political self-government appreciates full First Amendment
Show More

Related Documents: Arguments Against Freedom Of Speech

Analysis Of Justice Abe Fortas 'Arguments Armbands'

Justice Abe Fortas argue against public speech in an educational setting, while justice Hugo Black argue that one does not have a right to give speeches. In Justice Abe Fortas case he argues against public speech in educational setting. Justice Abe Fortas first argument was that the “undifferentiated fear on apprehension of disturbance is not enough to overcome the right to freedom of expression (4).Fortas is saying that fear cannot take away freedom. In Fortas second argument he reveals that “the vigilant…

Words 383 - Pages 2

Analysis Of The Second Treatise Of Government By John Stuart Mill

Chapter II of On Liberty, John Stuart Mill forms a strong argument for any limitation on the liberty of thought and discussion. Mill argues that “If all mankind minus one, were of the opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind” (Mill, p.14). In The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke, Locke argues for the aims of government and the proper extent…

Words 1373 - Pages 6

Rhetorical Analysis Of Shut Up And Play Nice

World is Limiting Free Speech”, the author, Jonathan Turley, makes the argument that free speech is being limited in the West. He supports this argument with numerous examples and comparisons. His argument is clear, convincing, and easy to understand. By using real-world examples and comparisons, he professionally presents a very controversial topic without becoming bogged-down in politics and inflammatory remarks, which boosts his credibility and the strength of his argument. Turley wrote about many…

Words 418 - Pages 2

Tinker V. Des Moines Case Study

argued against the students with arm bands and Fortas argued for the students wearing the armbands. Justice Fortas defended his opinion by arguing that he and the other student that was wearing armbands about a truce with Vietnam was freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is the first amendment so by Fortas arguing that the school was taking away the first amendment right away from the students was a strong argument. My only concerns about his argument is the school saying that it is against the rules…

Words 688 - Pages 3

Antigone Annotated Bibliography

that I can use within my analysis to strength my argument. First Source: Clinton, William. “Remarks at Michigan State University”. 5 May 1995, pp.481-484. Antigone Module Opening Page, https://alamo.instructure.com/courses/1112121/ pages/antigone-module-opening-page. Canvas, https://alamo.instructure.com. William J. Clinton’s speech, “Remarks at Michigan State University”, is focused on the idea that our government is trying to preserve our freedom along with keeping us safe, in addition to those…

Words 739 - Pages 3

Comparing Joseph Frederick's Arguments To Protect Student Speech

In both “Protect student speech — even 'unwise' bong banner” and “Policy reflects common sense,” two authors argue whether school interfere students’ rights to speech freely. This case took place where Juneau High School principal Deborah Morse suspended Joseph Frederick after he displayed a "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" banner. “BONG HiT” is a slang word refers to smoking marijuana. Deborah Morse believes that she has the right to stop and suspend Joseph Frederick because his banner violated school’s policy…

Words 615 - Pages 3

Summary: No Free Speech Without Hate Speech

No Free Speech Without Hate Speech The current rise of nationalism in Europe, along with the rise of Donald Trump in America has led to an increase in the use of the term “hate speech” in the nightly news reports across the country. Yet, there is no actual legal definition of Hate speech. The American Bar Association defines hate speech as , “ speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits” (“Debating…

Words 1304 - Pages 6

Finding Truth In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

people are not restricted in their speech or action, so long as their speech or actions do not violate another person's’ liberty. Moreover, what Mill considers as harmful does not include harm or criticism to ideas. Instead, Mill advocates for free speech and debate, so ideas can be criticised in a rational manner, leading to logical deduction that can allow for ideas to be closer to the truth. In chapter 2, Mill argues for freedom of speech and…

Words 1560 - Pages 7

Freedom Of Speech: The First Constitutional Amendment

Freedom of speech was established in 1971 is the first constitutional amendment in the bill of right is exceedingly important. Freedom of speech is the right to express any opinions without restriction or control. I realize this civil liberty is essential because it gives us right to express our own opinions and beliefs in public. There is no other government in the world that provides freedom to the people like the United States of America. Each and every citizen of the United States should be able…

Words 334 - Pages 2

Hate Puppies: The First Amendment Of The United States

I Hate Puppies I don’t really hate puppies, but the freedom of speech gives me the right to say so, no matter how much you disagree with it. The first amendment of the United State’s constitution is the freedom of speech and expression. This factors into the way American culture lives and thrives. Although some say free speech should be replaced by political correctness, the freedom of speech should not be suppressed because it is a fundamental right, helps develop individuality, and is a…

Words 649 - Pages 3