Arguments Against Torture

Words: 708

Pages: 3

Open Document

We are in the 21st century and yet we hear stories quite often of terrorist suspects who are still being tortured in prisons. The main argument against torture is that it mitigates a suspected terrorist's rights as a human being. Can this torturous behavior ever be justified? In my opinion, terrorists should not be tortured because the torture may cause them to lie in their confession in order for the torturing stops.
According to a publication on The Huffington Post, respondents in a new Reuters/Ipsos poll say that torture can be justified under certain circumstances. A recent Quinnipiac University poll also shows that Americans are less comfortable with the idea of broadening U.S. torture laws. Thirty-six percent of respondents, however, say that torture is “rarely” or “never” a justified interrogation method, with 21 percent saying “rarely” and 15 percent saying “never.” Torture is not a way of getting a suspect to confess, because chances are the accused is feeling pain or discomfort and he or she may want the pain to end so they make a false statement. One major event in the history of the United States is the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked 4 airplanes with many passengers in them. One plane hit the North Tower of the …show more content…
Sensory deprivation is used to instill a sense of fear, disorientation and cause dependency on the suspect. Dr Hebb of McGill University conducted studies on people to induce a state akin to psychosis by placing students in air-conditioned cubicles with earmuffs, gloves and goggles. Within 24 hours they began to experience hallucinations, and by 48 hours complete breakdown and disintegration of personality. Sensory deprivation has also been attributed to increased pain sensitivity and increased psychological stress. According to the Kubark manual, sensory deprivation makes the detainee more prone to the officer who’s doing the

Arguments Against Torture

became a worldwide, everyday thing in many countries, including the United States. Government types of people believe that we should torture these terrorists. By torturing these people it could start even more terrorist acts and at the same time can end them. I do not believe we should torture these terrorists and I have many articles and authors to support my claim. Torture is not an acceptable way to end terrorism. This is because I have many official authors articles that have been backed up by government…

Words 708 - Pages 3

Is Torture Ever Justified Analysis

Assignment Four: The Arguments Against Torture When Protecting America’s Security To cite a reference, Patricia Smith’s article titled, Is Torture Ever Justified?, directly cites President Barack Obama’s opposing arguments against the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogation tactics of the use of torture; to therefore, safeguard the United States of America’s security when threaten with potential terrorist attacks. Particularly, President Obama has become one of the loudest voices against the various use…

Words 446 - Pages 2

Torture and War Essay

Torture and Just War So much for diplomacy and the using of non-violence to retrieve valuable information from criminals. Our world today is much different from what it was so many hundred years ago when torture was seen as something proper and necessary that was the basis for people telling the truth or risking getting killed or seriously injured in the process. Nowadays there is so much red tape and bureaucracies that individuals have to respect before even thinking of perusing making it near…

Words 1408 - Pages 6

Essay about Michael Levin's the Case for Torture (Review)

“The Case for Torture” argues that there are various reasons for allowing torture to exist in the United States of America. Levin would love to see society change its negative views on torture so that, under certain circumstances, torture would be permissible. The article starts off with a very brief description of how he believes society views the subject of torture as a negative thing. He leads on to oppose that way of thinking and provides three cases in which he believes torture must be administered…

Words 2163 - Pages 9

Essay Against Torture

Torture should be allowed in the US as a weapon against terrorist. Why US should treat with respect terrorists while they blow up innocent people? Groups or people that support torture It helps to prevent imminent act of terrorism. Then, if terrorists are captured in order to prevent an imminent attack, we must obtain information at all cost. Furthermore, they can provide us with valuable information about when or where the terrorist attack will take place. Furthermore, in order to obtain information…

Words 1052 - Pages 5

Is Torture Ever Acceptable? Essay

Is torture ever acceptable? According to the UN Convention Against Torture, any infliction of torture1 i.e. waterboarding is banned under international law and the domestic laws of most countries in the 21st century. The point of contention is whether torture under any circumstances should be entirely prohibited. This opinion piece will be centered towards the debate regarding interrogation using torture methods and argue that torture is never acceptable from the moral and utilitarian perspectives…

Words 889 - Pages 4

Refutation Essay

is Too Far? In Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” published in 1982, he argues that torture will be a benefit toward our country. It has been said that torture is too brutal for this day and age but Michael Levin believes differently. Levin argues that torture would be a good way to prevent future evils, rather than looking at it as punishment it would be more of a “warning.” Democracies wouldn't lose anything if they chose to start using torture, Levin believes that they should really consider…

Words 588 - Pages 3

Pros And Cons Of Torture Essay

Torture as two aspects toward life and in this article itg helps support both sides. treaties such as the Geneva Conventions, the UN Convention against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the ban on torture or any cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment is absolute, even in times of war. Defenders of this blanket prohibition offer arguments that range from the moral (torture degrades and corrupts the society that allows it) to the practical (people will say anything…

Words 367 - Pages 2

Dershowitz: Torture Could Be Justified

The general public can never fully comprehend the extent of torture, as it is a mostly underground occurrence that we are only exposed to in brief glimpses of news—such as the release of prisoners being tortured in the Abu Ghraib prison—and through distorted depictions in the media. I think that torture should be avoided unless in extreme cases, such as the time bomb case presented by Dershowitz. Before the debate, I was against torture as a means of extracting information from suspects because it…

Words 1077 - Pages 5

Torture Ethical Dilemmas

There has been an ongoing moral dilemma in our society as to whether the United States government should use torture for counter terrorism efforts and if the use of torture is ethically permissible. I believe that torture can be justified using the utilitarian, common good and virtue approaches under the following circumstances; a planned attack is on the horizon, a planned attack will kill large number of citizens and we are almost certain that the terrorist/s in custody is/are a culprit of the…

Words 1276 - Pages 6