Most parents are concerned with the material their children read or what they are being read due to the content that it contains such as violence. According to the article, Real Simple, Dr. Suess’ “Hop on Pop” has been banned due to violence because parents feel that the younger audience is suggested to use violent force towards their parents. Some younger children may not understand what they are being read because they are younger and they don’t fully comprehend what the context is portraying. Television exposes children to an immense amount of violence even through watching the news. Violence has been adopted into our society to the extent of including it into the cinema. Therefore, banning children’s books with this type of content does not halt the production of violence …show more content…
According to statistical pie graph from the Banned & challenged Books website, 49% of public libraries banned books that were petitioned by parents. The constitution protects freedom of choice and parents who chose to give their children material that they believe is important should not be deprived of that right when books are banned. Therefore, parents have the choice of what they want their children to read or what they want to read to their children and it’s their right as a parent. It’s more efficient for parents to teach their children what they believe is acceptable to read than to appeal a book that goes against their personal principles and take away something other parents don’t mind allowing their children to have access