The theory of attachment defines how individuals when infants develop a bond or attachment with the parents or caregivers. Certainly agree with Bowlby’s theory that the attachment or qualitatively relationship is primarily with the mother or caregiver because mother or caregiver meet the infant’s needs for safety and security. I also understand the possibility of the display of a positive or negative strength of the attachment between a child and his or her mother and caregiver as determined by the child’s reaction to Ainsworth Strange Situation technique and the sequence of staged episodes based on Bowlby’s theory.
2) How does attachment explain human relationships and interactions? …show more content…
Both reactions showed the cognitive growth of emotional and social bonds between myself, my parents, my brother and my caregiver. When at home I would cry for my parents to hold me, I knew they would hold me to calm me down, they would put me down and I would cry again. By the age of 12 months while interacting with my brother I was self-aware of myself and was able to separate the people I knew from the people I did not. By the age of 2 years old my theory of mind was developed I had the knowledge and understood the others’ actions. I was able to decode others non-verbal and verbal expressions. I was also able to demonstrate empathy to others’ feelings. Understanding other people actions affected my own behavior. Throughout my infancy the need for the formation of an emotional secure attachment pattern and bond was met by both my mother and my caregiver. The quality of the secure attachment pattern is still affecting my social development and interactions at 19 years of age. Certainly the secure attachment pattern I grew up with will impact my children’s own attachment