In the landmark case of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 established that prosecution must turn over all evidence to the defense that might exonerate the defendant and or in the determination of punishment. The prosecutor in this case withheld exculpatory evidence that there was reasonable probability the conviction would have been different had the evidence been disclosed to the defense. Ethically, it is a prosecutor’s duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one. (DeGabrielle and Turner, 2013). As the United …show more content…
United States, the victim in one statement two days after the shooting told a detective that Shelton shot him, but a mere forty minutes after the shooting the victim had told another police officer he did not know who had shot him. This information was not disclosed to the defense during the Shelton’s first trial, which prompted a mistrial and by the second trail all original prosecutors had been replaced. The misconduct of the prosecution was simply replaced and was not held responsible for the mishandling of the case and failed to disclose to the defense notes of the first officer. In the case of Imble v. Pachtman, 131 S. Ct 1350, 1372 (2011). The prosecutor discovered information after the trial that corroborated the defendant’s alibi and revealed it because he believed “prosecuting attorney had a duty to be fair and see all the true facts whether helpful to the case or not, should be presented.” (DeGabrielle and Turner,