Evidence Based Practice Literature Review

Words: 499
Pages: 2

Authored by Scott O. Linienfeld and associates, “Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: Root causes and constructive remedies” looks to identify sources of resistance to evidence-based treatment by clinical psychologists. The sources identified by researchers are naïve realism, believing myths of human nature, application of group probability to all individuals, confusion regarding unvalidated and invalidated treatments, misrepresentations of evidence-based treatments, and attitude problems among clinicians. The paper concludes with suggestions for improving use of evidence-based practice among clinical psychologists and graduate students studying to enter the field. Several methods recommended for clinicians are motivational incentives, leaders in the field must change first, and changing sooner rather than later so attitudes do not grow more entrenched. To increase evidence-based practice among …show more content…
I found the most interesting association between the text and the article in Chapter 13, regarding Clinical Practice Guidelines in children. It is startling that while adult disorders have some specific guidelines to treat, “… the development of treatment guidelines for childhood disorders has lagged behind significantly” (Hunsley & Lee 2009). I find it striking that with the lack of empirically based practice often being the case when clinicians are treating adults, that treatment guidelines are actually worse for children. While it is difficult, or even not allowed by the DSM, to diagnose children with specific disorders at young ages, during childhood when early symptoms are present is an excellent time to help high risk children. If evidence-based treatment guidelines were put into practice by clinical psychologists treating children, more children would likely be helped to avoid full diagnosis, and avoid a lifetime of further