Fahrenheit 451 Research Paper

Words: 540
Pages: 3

In life, the diversity of knowledge and creativity we gain through books has always been available. However, the characters in Fahrenheit 451 have limited access to something we find so common. This goes to show that censorship has a detrimental effect on society. The characters in Fahrenheit 451 don't have the freedom to read a book and retain knowledge from them. Most of them don’t even know how much creativity they can unlock by reading a book. This is because they are brought up to think books are subversive objects and dangerous and bring unhappiness. They don't understand how much knowledge they can gain by reading these so-called “dangerous” books. In the book, the firefighters create fires instead of putting them out. The main character, …show more content…
I chose to burn the first half of my book because it represents the human mind without creativity and knowledge. It also shows how it is affected by the censorship placed on society and how everything is seen and heard with caution. It shows how minds are blank and burned out without the color of creativity. Towards the end of the book, Guy starts to change. After reading one book, he has a new perspective on life. He gains new knowledge and finds his sense of creativity, which helps him escape the censored life he is so used to. “I don’t talk things, sir, I talk the meaning of things.” (Bradbury 76). I chose to represent this quote by highlighting and annotating the second side of the book. The annotations show how, after retaining the immersive experience of a book, people are forced to think beyond words and think about their meaning. After Guy sees the potential of changing his life after reading his book, his creativity starts to blossom. “We're going to meet a lot of lonely people in the next week and the next month and the next year. And when they ask us what we're doing, you can say, We're remembering. That's where we'll win in the long