Gideon V. Wainwright Case

Words: 839
Pages: 4
Open Document
The case of Gideon v. Wainwright was a case that took place in the year 1963. In the state of Florida in that time, the only way you could have a free counsel appointed to you is if you were on death row. This case made it so that no matter who you are, you can have a court appointed counsel if you can’t pay for one yourself. This case dealt with issues of the 6th amendment, and the 14th amendment as well. The Sixth Amendment guarantees that having a counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as well. Because Gideon was not on death row, he did not have a court appointed counsel, so he decided to represent himself instead of having someone else represent him like what would …show more content…
Personally, when I look at the Sixth Amendment, I think that it means that when someone is accused, they have the right to have a quick, public trial with an impartial jury. They are to be informed of the reason they are being accused, and they should be confronted by the person testifying against them, he should have witnesses in his favor, and he should have Counsel for his defense. As well as the Sixth Amendment being involved in this, the Fourteenth Amendment is another key part of the constitution that is involved in this case. After reading Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, I would have to say that I think it means that anyone that is a citizen of the United States has rights and the state cannot make or enforce any law that will affect the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States. They also cannot deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law or deny any person equal protections of the law. By not letting Gideon have a court appointed Counsel for his defense, he was denied rights according to the Sixth Amendment, and he was denied due process as well according to the Fourteenth Amendment. These sections of the Constitution have a very big part in this case and they are pretty much the only two that are seen in the case. Gideon was very correct to say that his rights were denied, because they
Show More

Related Documents: Gideon V. Wainwright Case

Wainwright V. Gideon Case

claimed to have seen Clarence Earl Gideon in the poolroom early that morning. Based on this accusation alone, the police arrested him and charged him with breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny. Too poor to afford a lawyer, Gideon appeared at the Florida Circuit Court alone and requested that the judge appoint a lawyer to him as entitled by his Sixth Amendment right to counsel (Oyez). The judge stated that he could not appoint counsel to represent Gideon because “under the laws of the…

Words 594 - Pages 3

The Gideon V. Wainwright Case

In 1963 during the Gideon V. Wainwright case, the United States Supreme Court held the 6th and 14th amendments to a standard where these two amendments were actually put into place and enforced. These amendments state the right to a speedy trial and the right to a defense lawyer for free if a person is too poor to afford one. Ultimately, this system was created to give jobs and help criminal indigent defendants who couldn’t afford lawyers, so, they put into practice the American Bar Association (ABA…

Words 399 - Pages 2

Summary Of The Gideon V. Wainwright Case

Clarence Gideon was charged in Florida state court with breaking and entering. Although Gideon requested the court to provide him with a lawyer, one could only be provided to those that cannot afford it in the state of Florida. Because of this, Gideon represented himself and was sentenced to five years in prison. Gideon then filed a habeas corpus petition due to his belief that the court was in violation of his constitutional right to be appointed an attorney. The petition was denied (Oyez, accessed…

Words 558 - Pages 3

Gideon V. Wainwright Case Summary

petitioner, Gideon, was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison. Following his imprisonment, he applied for a write of habeas corpus from the State Supreme Court, stating that his conviction violets his guaranteed rights by the constitution and the Bill of Rights. The State Supreme Court later denied him all relief. Subsequently, Gideon was then granted a writ of certiorari by the Supreme Court, and preceded in forma pauperis. The appellant and petitioner of the case is Gideon, while the respondent…

Words 1059 - Pages 5

Case Study: Gideon V. Wainwright

Title: Gideon v Wainwright 372 U.S. 335 (1963) Facts: In Florida, Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested and charged for breaking and entering into a pool room. At trial, Gideon did not have a lawyer, because in Florida at this time, only those charged with a capitol offense were given free representation. As a result, Gideon tried to defend himself in court, but he was uneducated and failed. Gideon on his own then filed for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme court and ir was reviewed. At the supreme…

Words 317 - Pages 2

Gideon V. Wainwright Case Summary

Gideon, when charged with breaking and entering and having the intention of committing a misdemeanor, requested a lawyer from the court for defense. He was told that counsel is only appointed in capital cases when the defendant is poor and cannot afford defense. Gideon represented himself in court and was sentenced to five years. He filed for writ of habeas corpus under the Florida Supreme Court because he saw his conviction as unconstitutional and was denied He filed once again under the US Supreme…

Words 364 - Pages 2

Case Study: Gideon V. Wainwright Case

Issues The services provided by the NJOPD are not completely free since depending on the case and income level client may be required to pay for their respective services. This stipulation is clarified to clients during the CJP walk-in process when they receive their reimbursement agreement. The idea of a fee for representation is somewhat questionable considering it contrast with the idea of a public defender while contradicting the Miranda Rights statement specifically “ You have the right to…

Words 610 - Pages 3

Gideon V. Wainwright Case Study

On June 3, 1961 a man named Earl Gideon was convicted of a crime they were not for sure if he did. Between midnight and eight a.m. a burglary happened at the Bay Harbor Poolroom in Panama City, Florida. This unknown person that had broken in broke the door, smashed a cigarette machine and a record player, and stole man from the cash register from this poolroom establishment. So based on accusation the police arrested Gideon and charged him with breaking and entering with the intent of committing…

Words 1014 - Pages 5

Gideon Vs Wainwright Essay

Court case of Gideon v. Wainwright was one of the most important cases in US Supreme Court History. The case developed an issue for Congress on whether or not the states are obliged to provide an attorney for defendants in criminal cases who are unable to afford to pay for one. It also created a conflict with whether or not this action should fall under the legal doctrine of the amendments in the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court’s ruling of the landmark case Gideon v. Wainwright helped…

Words 625 - Pages 3

History Of Gideon Vs Wainwright

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) This decision established that indigent defendants have the right to an attorney in criminal cases. This decision has had a significant impact on criminal law, as it ensures that defendants who cannot afford an attorney are still able to receive legal representation. The right to appointed counsel has existed in federal criminal cases since the 1930s. But because the Gideon decision reached the much larger universe of state court defendants, it is still recognized as pivotal…

Words 561 - Pages 3