Essay about Kant Criticism

Submitted By crinaaa17
Words: 573
Pages: 3
Open Document
Criticism on Kant’s Categorical Imperative

Kant was an original thinker not only in the field of ethics but in virtually every area of philosophy. His reputation skyrocketed during the last two decades of his life, and during the nineteenth century his writings were the most influential philosophical writings in Europe. Many philosophers agreed with his theories and adopted his specialized Kantian vocabulary. Others, however, were less happy with Kant’s elaborate philosophical system and picked away at parts of it, including the categorical imperative.
Kant’s philosophy served as a source of inspiration for the German philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer. Despite the fact that he adopted many of Kant’s ideas, he also criticised some aspects of his philosophy, especially the Categorical Imperative. For Schopenhauer, the CI simply reduces to the egoistic principle: “I shouldn’t do to others what I don’t want done to myself.” Schopenhauer believed that the human behaviour is guided sometimes by sympathy for others and other times by egoistic concerns for oneself. He argued that truly moral conduct must be sympathetic, an idea contradicted by Kant’s CI.
Another early criticism of the Categorical Imperative is that by the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Hegel analysed Kant’s first formulation of the CI: “Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature.” According to Hegel, this formula “is reduced to empty formalism, and moral science is converted into mere rhetoric about duty for duty’s sake.” That is, it does not offer a clear guideline for assessing moral conduct, and it does not provide any specific moral duties that can be followed. While the CI may sound good in theory, it is difficult to apply in real life because it does not acknowledge contradictory actions.
Similarly, Jean Paul Sartre criticises Kant’s philosophy. He argued the fact that Kant’s CI does not provide guidance when facing dilemmas. He supported his idea by using an example from his own experience, during the Nazi occupation of France. Here, a young man is torn between his duty to his country, which impelled him to join the resistance and which would possibly lead to his dead and his duty to his mother who had already lost her other sons to the war. Kant’s ethical theory states that both imperatives are categorical, therefore pulling the young man is two different ways. This proves that the CI is not
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Kant Criticism

Phil Essay Extra Credit

to Lie….” was a response to a significant criticism which was raised for his views about telling truth as an unconditional duty. Kant believes that every action must be done in accordance with duty, and being truthful is also a form of duty. He believes that deviating from the principle of duty can not only be disadvantageous, but can also lead to undesirable consequences. With Kant’s believes of unconditional truthfulness, philosophers raised criticisms and their main argument being “To tell the…

Words 1046 - Pages 5

Emmanuel Kant Essay

Emmanuel Kant Religious toleration: Emmanuel Kant begins his own view of criticisms of the organization and practices of religious groups to those that encourage what he sees as a false sense of religion to that of God. Here Kant argues against religious intolerance by explaining that although humans are certain of our moral duties, human beings do not have an established certainty of God's commands. Thus a religious belief that demands a contravention of morality according to Kant can never be…

Words 1213 - Pages 5

Philosophy: Virtue Ethics and Natural Sciences Essay example

culture can become intelligible,” meaning the Enlightenment was the “predecessor culture” to the catastrophe of emotivism (MacIntyre 39). Two major schools of thought emerged at this time: utilitarianism, championed by Mill, and deontology, championed by Kant and his descendent in thought, Kierkegaard. In order to prove that the conflicting views did not cause the Enlightenment project to fail, one must prove that their theses are reasonable or that they are non exclusive meaning there is room for a median…

Words 1973 - Pages 8

Kant's Response To Hume

Eric Watkins, and Wayne Waxman as well as Michelle Grier’s work on transcendental illusion. The tendency in Kant scholarship has been to interpret Kant’s relationship to Hume narrowly. The familiar narrative is that Hume’s account of causation presented Kant with a challenge. Hume denies the a priori origin of the concept of cause and so the a priori justification of all causal judgments, and Kant responds to a generalized version of these denials in the Metaphysical and Transcendental Deductions…

Words 647 - Pages 3

Immanuel Kant Research Paper

determination of whether a particular instance qualifies as one thing or another.” (Litch). Immanuel Kant was born April 22, 1724, in the city of Konigsberg which was an isolated German province of East Prussia. Kant was raised in a strict a strict Pietist atmosphere, at the age of eight he started attending a Pietist school until he was sixteen (Strathern). When Kant was…

Words 1380 - Pages 6

Immanuel Kant Essay

Immanuel Kant, I.A. Richards and Laura Mulvey are all relatable critics. All of these critics reference the sublime and as to what we think is both beautiful and inspirational. Kant is a critic that deals with the beautiful and the sublime. In From Critique of Judgement, Kant argues that the beautiful is anything that creates a feeling of beauty for you. While he believes the sublime is anything that creates a feeling of beauty and at the same time inspires you. Kant believes both of these judgements…

Words 1077 - Pages 5

Kant's Non-Consequentialist Theory

Are happiness and prosperity the only driving forces that push humans to come to a means of action? According to Kant, the reasoning behind one’s motive should be decided on by good will. “Good will acts out of respect for the moral law, not to receive reward, avoid punishment or criticism, or for any other self-serving motive” (Kant). In this essay, the non-consequentialist theory will be covered along with correlating views encompassing the theory. The example we were given about AIDS is a situation…

Words 678 - Pages 3

Steinberger's Argument That The Maxims Of Breaking Promises

mere logical consistence. Steinberger reviews Harrison’s argument that the maxim of breaking promises , if universalized, undermine the systematic harmony of purposes. Since such result is based on experience of breaking promises. Kemp argues that Kant indicates self-contradiction in the CI is essentially logical. Steinberger takes Harrison’s point is at best the causal ones, not logical impossibilities. I will call this ‘reason alone consistence’ later because reason cannot alone identify the moral…

Words 7178 - Pages 29

Philosopher - Immanuel Kant Essay example

Immanuel Kant A Famous Philosopher 10/21/2012 Kelley Huttar Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804): Immanuel Kant was a modern day German deontologist from Prussia and became one of history’s most famous Philosophers. A deontologist is someone who believes in acts that are strictly right or wrong. Kant was an influential thinker and one of the last philosophers of the Enlightenment era. However his work in epistemology (the study of knowledge) and theology (the study of religion) are still influential…

Words 2218 - Pages 9

Pros And Cons Of John Mill's Theory Of Utilitarianism

in many situations. He believes people should be held responsible for their actions, that is most definitely a pro. Per contra if we used the same scenario I gave with Mill and the character of the five people they were to save we can use that with Kant. What if the one person he decided they should save versus the five was a terrible person contrary to the other five maybe it would be more beneficial to save them…

Words 1338 - Pages 6