Lizzie Borden Case

Words: 3956
Pages: 16

An 1800s axe murderer walks free in society, facing no repercussions for the atrocities she’s committed. In 1892, a husband and wife, Andrew and Abby Borden, and their own child, Lizzie Borden, brutally slaughtered them. In spite of all the evidence pointing towards her, a woman is able to leave the trial free, the prime and only suspect in one of the most brutal murder cases to date. Regardless of lacking a confirmed murder weapon, her plausible motive along with contradictory testimony, statements, alibis, and the societal bias prevailing at the time. The inconsistencies in her testimony, paired with the lack of alignment between her statements, alibis, and the testimonies of others, alongside the evidence found at the crime scene, all raise …show more content…
The case underscores the importance of advocating for justice and putting factual evidence first, in order to ensure that criminals face the consequences of their actions, thus protecting the integrity and wellbeing of society as a whole. An 1800s axe murderer walks free in society, facing no repercussions for the atrocities she’s committed. In 1892, a husband and wife, Andrew and Abby Borden, and their own child, Lizzie Borden, brutally slaughtered them. In spite of all the evidence pointing towards her, a woman is able to leave the trial free, the prime and only suspect in one of the most brutal murder cases to date. Regardless of lacking a confirmed murder weapon, her plausible motive along with contradictory testimony, statements, alibis, and the societal bias prevailing at the time. The inconsistencies in her testimony, paired with the lack of alignment between her statements, alibis, and the testimonies of others, alongside the evidence found at the crime scene, all raise significant doubts about her credibility. The contradiction between what she says during the testimony and what other people say leads many to