In an effort to correct this divide, a program known as diplomada has been implemented which focuses on, “re-training indigenous parents, …show more content…
This unfair regulation is not effective as it is impossible to compare the relative performance of individuals teaching throughout a diverse socioeconomic based on students’ performance on a test. Even the independent agency granted autonomy under the education reform bill warned that evaluations may, “uncover the depth of Mexico’s educational deficiencies but will not necessarily improve or address the causes of those problems.” Mexico’s educational deficiencies are already known and mandating teachers and students take evaluations to confirm this is a waste of money. In fact, this policy might actually promote worse teachers as those who fail teacher evaluations three times are, “placed in administrative posts.” Instead of focusing on corruption, the root cause of educational problems in Mexico, Nieto’s reforms instead aim to broaden it by keeping teachers deemed unsuccessful, on the payroll as …show more content…
This was the most unwise move the Nieto administration made regarding educational public policy. According to a report from The Economist, the CNTE, “Saw straight through the ploy,” and instead of quieting down, they stepped up its protests.” The move to retract their education reform policies signified a government which does not follow through with its plans, and one which caters to the voters, very much like the old PRI. Proponents of education reform such as the president of Mexicanos Primero warned, “If they give in to these guys, they are giving in to counter-reform and corruption.” This move upset both education reformers and education ‘counter-reformers’ alike, and stimulated more protests throughout election day. Now, the government won’t be seen as capable by the people of following through with education reform, and dishonest to the protesting teachers when the reforms were implemented after the