Nt1310 Unit 4 Assignment

Words: 492
Pages: 2

VI. Results and Discussion The analysis of the information gathered is shown in this section. To make the facts easier to understand, they are presented in a table. Table 1 - The. Level of Multiplication Skill of Learners Before and After the Implementation of Intervention Scores Descriptive Equivalent Rating Frequency (Before the Intervention) Frequency (After the Intervention) 90-100 Outstanding Performance (OP) 0 13 85-89 Very Satisfactory Performance (VSP) 3 0 80-84 Satisfactory Performance (SP) 3 0 75-79 Poor Performance (PP) 3 0 Below 75 Did Not Meet Expectation (DNME) 13 9 Total 22 22 22

Table 1 shows the results of the multiplication skill of learners on the multiplication (Window Card 1) operation assessment before and after the implementation
…show more content…
This indicates that the learners had difficulty on multiplication (window 1) operation, which means they failed based on their scores in the pre-test. It implied that learners had poor background knowledge in multiplication. Additionally, this implies that they are unable to answer the multiplication window card 1 within the allotted time given to them. During the assessment, the researcher provided multiplication (window card 1) operation to the learners. The researcher conducted the Magic Finger Technique to the learners. This was done on weekdays, Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from January-April 2024. After the intervention, the results of the assessment showed great improvement. From zero, thirteen (13) of them showed outstanding on multiplication skills and from thirteen (13), only nine (9) did not meet the expectation on multiplication (window card 1) operation. This merely demonstrates how effective the researcher's intervention was in helping the learners answer the multiplication (window card 1) operation. The results of the study indicate that the magic finger method is a useful tool for teaching one- to two-digit whole number