Can we calculate the equilibrium for the entire MgO-SiO2 range? If so, can we use these values to create a phase diagram for these minerals?
What minerals are present in this composition range?
2. What are the main conclusions of the paper? Look in the Abstract and Conclusions.
The main conclusions of the paper are that the most accurate part of the MgO-SiO2 range to calculate equilibrium is the middle compositions. This is because they are thinner than the silicon end and do not need as high temperatures to reach equilibrium as the Mg end. The Si-rich end composition is less accurate because it is too thick to measure accurately. On the Mg rich end the temperatures …show more content…
The previous data that they used in this experiment does not give a consistent melting temperature but gives a range (between 2,800°C and 2,500°C) which shows that the melting temperature is too big to be accurate with. Another piece of evidence is the fact that only the middle compositions are completely plotted on the phase diagram for this system. Another piece of evidence that supports the conclusion is the fact that Forsterite (1890° C) and Enstatite (1577°C) had lower melting points than Magnesia. Forsterite also had a higher melting point than Cristobalite (1625°C). The phase diagram shows the highest recordable point in the middle composition range (middle of phase diagram) and not on the phase diagram ends. This is again supporting the conclusion that the most accurate part of this system is the middle compositions. Also, the fact that the liquidus was harder to create on the silicon end of the phase diagram helps support the conclusion that the middle compositions are the most reliable and accurate. All the above support the conclusion that the middle part of the diagram is the most accurate part of the system to calculate the equilibrium