Operant Vs Classical Conditioning

Words: 828
Pages: 4

Operant and classical conditioning are two very significant approaches important to behavioral psychology. Operant conditioning is the technique of behavior adjustment in which a certain behavior/action is decreased or increased for a negative or positive reinforcement every time the behavior or action happens. This is so that whenever the subject repeats the behavior, they associate the behavior with the pleasure or displeasure of either type of the reinforcement tactics that were used. So it explains how consequences lead to changes in voluntary behavior.
Classical conditioning is the process of which a neutral stimulus and an unconditional stimulus are paired together to produce a bodily response by itself. The neutral stimulus begins to generate a specific involuntary response. Therefore, the subject has learned that the neutral stimulus leads to a specific response (doesn’t always necessarily have to be bad). So for example, if the subject is presented with food and a bell rings, they will associate the bell with the food and they will get excited every time they
…show more content…
But sometimes he gets these urges and you can tell he’s getting ready to start itching but then he just stops. To continue his motion of itching his bug bites, he needs reinforcement as in his favorite candy; every time he goes to scratch, he gets offered a Reese’s piece. Every time he gets closer than the last time, more is given to him. He’ll soon eventually associate the more he gets closer to itching, the more Reese’s pieces he’ll get. This is an example of positive reinforcement because candy is given to push him to continue itching. Although, you are taking away the itching of the bite, the whole purpose of the candy is simply to get him to