My third and last defense of Singer’s normative principle is the case of Bob and the Bugatti. Bob has invested all of his savings and invested in a brand new, uninsured Bugatti. One day he parks his Bugatti on train tracks. He notices a child tied down on a separate track. There is a train speeding down the tracks towards the child. There is a lever that he can pull, which will divert the train onto the tracks where his Bugatti is parked. Bob can either let the child get hit and save his Bugatti, or let his Bugatti get hit and save the child. According to Singer’s strong normative principle, Bob should pull the lever, as the life of the child holds much more moral value than his Bugatti. Most people would probably also agree that letting the child get hit by the train to save the Bugatti is wrong. Singer’s strong normative principle states we should choose to save the child, so it is a good normative principle to follow. Likewise, I will also argue that we have a moral duty to oppose killings due to police brutality in the