Political Factors Of The Supreme Court

Words: 1512
Pages: 7
Open Document
The Supreme Court is currently the highest of the judicial courts in the country, with nine justices and judicial precedence over the existing courts in the nation. The Supreme Court Justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated for their positions by the president, then judged and possibly appointed by the United States Senate. Being appointed by both the president and the United States Senate, there is possibility that certain factors may influence the decisions done by the Supreme Court Justices; it is debatable if the Supreme Court could be effective and an agent of social change. While there are different factors, the main two can be classified as legal factors, and political factors, where the other factors …show more content…
Those in favor of judicial restraint would be in favor of the elected branches, and embrace their policies, laws, and other actions. While the opposite side is the judicial activism, and while it is not entirely opposed to the actions and laws of the elected branch, it argues that the Court must have a strong hand in protecting minority rights, and interpreting the Constitution, even if it means overturning the elected branch’s decisions. Though some might argue that the two sides would prove ineffective, as public opinion is considered more prominent a factor in the Supreme Court’s decisions, yet that does not exclude a small rarity of cases that involved favor for unpopular …show more content…
Yet I still think that it can be effective, even in a society where conflict is important. While conflict brings up two sides, each one with their own points to their argument, they bring up issues that plague them, and or others. The Supreme Court allows them to speak their problems, each of the opposing sides getting a chance to voice their complaints and feelings in a controlled environment.
This allows their opinions to be publicized, considered by the people, and even if the court’s decision is faulty, the citizens can act up against it. Either it is by protests, or changing their vote in the next elections, the Supreme Court allows for social changes and Democracy by bringing issues to light. In a society where politically we grow by conflict, there needs to be a balance in each side of an argument debating on what they belief and feel. And although it may not be perfect, I believe the Supreme Court can be an effective agent of Democracy and social
Show More

Related Documents: Political Factors Of The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Research Paper

Is the Supreme Court a legal or political institution? The Supreme Court is the third branch of the United States government established in 1789, and has many different roles within the government. Its main roles include hearing cases presented by the lower courts and working closely with The Constitution to investigate whether acts are coherent with the document or not**. Although the branches are on a horizontal line of power, the Supreme Court’s power in The Constitution is rather vague and brief…

Words 1301 - Pages 6

How Did The President Influence The Supreme Court

Research Proposal President’s influence on the Supreme Court justice: Introduction: The Supreme Court is the highest and most powerful court in the United States. The Constitution only mentions that the Supreme Court has judicial power, ranking it as the uppermost. The Supreme Court is influenced by certain factors. When a vacancy occurs because of death, retirement, or impeachment of a Supreme Court justice, the president appoints a new justice who then must be confirmed by a majority of the Senate…

Words 1132 - Pages 5

American Nationalism Dbq

the British in the War of 1812, which was an event directed America to enter the Era of Good Feelings, Americans started to identify themselves as “Americans” rather than divided inhabitors of specific states. Although Marshall’s ruling in the Supreme Court that reinforced the Constitution contributed to an increased sense of American nationalism in this period, American nationalism was bolstered by the demise of two-party system which temporarily terminated the conflict between the Federalists and…

Words 1546 - Pages 7

Gerrymandering Research Paper

The issue of gerrymandering has long been a present and continuous issue in American politics. Gerrymandering can be defined as the intentional manipulation of electoral districts to favor a particular political party. North Carolina, in particular, has been involved in numerous Supreme Court cases over the years addressing and regulating gerrymandering. Although there are different types of gerrymandering, no matter the type, gerrymandering ultimately is harmful and compromises the democratic ideas…

Words 931 - Pages 4

Gerrymandering Research Paper

defined by a term known as gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the political process of deliberate manipulation of electoral district boundaries for partisan advantage. Historically, the roots of gerrymandering lie in undermining the voting power of minorities. Gerrymandering is an effective tool to dilute the power of voters in America. Along this comes disenfranchisement, or voter suppression; systemically targeting opposing political groups via polling locations to voting laws. This paper aims to…

Words 723 - Pages 3

Judiciary's Weak Check on Bureaucracy Essay

weak check on bureaucratic power. Defining the Problem In 1776, the founding fathers created the Constitution of the United States of America and thus proceeded to build a government “by the people, for the people”. Within those documents, the Supreme Court of the United States was born with the task of upholding the laws of the nation. Those laws were created by representatives of the people sitting in their respective seats of the House of Representatives and the Senate. With each stroke of the…

Words 3687 - Pages 15

Balance Of Power In The United States

According to the Cornell Law School, “Both the national government and the smaller political subdivisions have the power to make laws and both have a certain level of autonomy from each other. The United States has a federal system of governance consisting of the national or federal government, and the government of the individual states”…

Words 1832 - Pages 8

Legalization Marijuana Essay

1. Differences in political philosophy I. Federalists: (Democrats) Believed in the need for a strong central government. Believed that the central government would protect the citizens in a way that the states couldn’t or wouldn’t. Thought that this was the only way to create a country rather than just 13 states. II. Anti-Federalists: (Republicans) Thought most power must remain with the States. Feared tyranny like the British Monarchy would result from a strong central government. Said if they…

Words 3988 - Pages 16

Citizens United Vs Fec Case Study

specific candidates and political parties. This was a very controversial case because many believe that putting a limit on spending would violate the First Amendment. Still, others believe that corporations should not be able to spend money, as it takes away from the majority group and the working class. People will likely base their opinions in this case on how they personally interpret the First Amendment. Even though there are many pros and cons within this case, the Supreme Court did rule correctly…

Words 1313 - Pages 6

Supreme Court of the United States and Sc Essay

“A political not judicial institution.” Discuss this view. (45) There has been ongoing debate about how political the Supreme Court (SC) is. The Supreme Court can be defined as the highest court in the USA which has nine unelected judges who have been approved by the senate and nominated by the president – The sole reason why it is seen to be political? Currently Obama has made two successful appointments of Sonya Sotomayor in 2006 and Elena Kagan in 2010 and hoping to make his third nomination…

Words 1606 - Pages 7