Researcher Identity

Words: 1395
Pages: 6

Researcher Identity and Qualifications The researcher in this article is Dr. Loureen Downes, an assistant professor and Nurse Practitioner in Fort Myers, Florida. She gained her BSN from Southern Adventist University, her Masters degree and education from Florida Atlantic University, and her PhD from the University of Connecticut. From her Masters degree, she became a Family Nurse Practitioner and also currently works in the Primary Health Care Graduate Program at Florida Gulf Coast University. Dr. Downes has over 30 years of experience in a multitude of areas including primary care, ER, critical care, and cardiac catheterization and rehabilitation. She also has 12 years of experience teaching both undergraduate, and graduate, nursing students. …show more content…
When trying to form a possible PICOT question, it clearly states the population as a cohort of college students, and the researchers are studying the relationship between motivators and barriers to health behaviors, BMI, and demographic variables. It seems as if the motivators of health behaviors, BMI, and demographic variables would be the intervention, and the barriers to these would be the comparison, but it is a little hard to tell. It is a little difficult to form an outcome because the researchers are necessarily looking for a specific positive or negative outcome. They are looking for both positive and negative relationships between motivators and barriers. There is no time frame to be found in this …show more content…
The students were recruited at an annual community health fair by being asked to participate upon walking into the event. The researcher included certain criteria when selecting the students, which included being a student at the university, being at least 18 years old, and being able to read and speak English. It was a good idea to include this in the article so that the readers are aware of how the population was chosen. The sample size included 106 students, which was a decent amount to handle. It was enough students to get a good amount of data, but not enough to cause the data analysis to become overwhelming. It explained in the article that the participants were required to read a letter of consent, and that the information was anonymous. The data collection method was outlined nicely in this article as well. This section is very organized with each collection method bolded, followed by an explanation. This study included a Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Motivators and Barriers of Health Behaviors Scale, Anthropometric measures, and demographics. This article did a very nice job explaining the details of these methods and what they tested for.
Procedures/Ethics
The students were fully aware of the nature of the research because they were required to read a letter of consent before participating. The survey was voluntary, not forced, and all of the answers were anonymous to protect the