Rhetorical Analysis Of Social Media

Words: 982
Pages: 4

Linker and Parker both demonstrate rhetorical appeals in their articles. Parkers exigence towards her article is saying that Social media is not destroying America. We just need to use it in the right ways. This article appeals more towards the people who may love social media and think that there is nothing wrong with it. Linker on the other hand, his exigence is bashing Twitter and how there is nothing good that comes out of it. Causing people to become someone they are not, being able to hide behind a screen. Instead of people who love social media Linker draws in more people that think social media is outrageous and getting taken out of hand, agreeing with what Linker has to say. Linker demonstrated this task much better than Parker by …show more content…
He discredits himself instead of bragging about the knowledge that he knows. By saying “Everyone else in the room wants their approval and attention, including the right-wing trolls seated at the burnout table in the corner, and the geeks who toil away on public policy at universities and think tanks, and more ordinary scribblers like me, who write for slightly lesser- known magazines and websites” (Linker). Credibility is used but in a odd way, he discredits himself for being “lesser” but still mentions himself in the situation of the high school cafeteria. Showing ethos by comparing a common situation to the real life Twitter problem and discrediting himself while doing …show more content…
Prime Minister Theresa May wasted no time in blaming the internet for the terrorist attack in London earlier this month. “We cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed,” she said. “Yet that is precisely what the internet, and the big companies that provide internet-based services provide.” Now May plans to join forces with French Prime Minister Emmanuel Macron in fining tech companies that do not take action against online extremism” (Parker.) Explaining that even Prime Ministers are complaining about social media and how it may have caused the terrorist attack on London. In contrast Parker and Linkers article both show rhetorical appeals but Linker gets the prize for most persuading and effective use of those appeals