Same River Twice Meaning

Words: 984
Pages: 4

Quotes from the past are the knowledge passed by those who pondered upon a subject for great deal of their time, therefore, they must be taken with a lot of consideration, and understand that each quote offers wisdom and knowledge that we could fathom without sacrificing our time, in a way like the books do for our minds, they nurture it by helping it to expand. The quotes "You can never step into the same river twice" and "What exists is uncreated and imperishable (unchanging) for it is whole and unchanging and complete. it was not or nor shall be different since it is now, all at once, one and continuous" are very similar and different at the same time, each offers wisdom, an advice, and a philosophical perspective. …show more content…
It is not necessary to accept an idea that quote has, one must be able to entertain an idea without accepting it, and that is the ultimate philosophical perspective. Life is a book and repeating same actions, and remaining in the same place is like reading the very first page and ignoring the rest. If one can never step into the same river twice, then why behave the same way every day, or eat the same food. the quote "You can never step into the same river twice" is such a powerful saying that it could be interpreted in many ways which makes it full of wisdom. It offers the reader to read the quote and perceive it directly as it is, or use it and its immense wisdom, to interpret it in the way it could benefit in various situations. One could say this quote says that each day is a new day, which in a way it does, or that each day is an experience, therefore, there is no such thing as a failure, only experiences and the way we react to …show more content…
As mentioned one could read the following quotes and perceive it directly as written, and still acquire knowledge, or it could be used to interpret into many different situations, it could be perceived in multiple ways, depending on the individual and their perspective on life. But what sets this two quotes a side is that their philosophical view are different. One states that everything around us is as it is and it is imperishable but the other states that nothing will be same after time has passed. They are both right and wrong depending on the situation and the way an individual is use them. It has been said that even the broken clock is right once a day, same can apply for this quotes, in a certain situation one is right while the are is wrong. As mentioned only times is imperishable and unalterable. It is no different that it will be in near future, for it is always now. This premise could contradict many beliefs because of the way time is been perceived on everyday basis. But if humans had an ability to ask a tree, or an animal what time it was, the answer would be now. As for the change, which is inevitable with everything else other than time, one must simply have an optimistic view on everything including the change, and see it as a beneficial factor that could help an individual grow, and develop into a human being everyone