Essay on supreme court decision

Submitted By adriennemrule
Words: 760
Pages: 4
Open Document
Phelps v. U.S. case decision Vampirism- the alternate lifestyle based on the modern perception of vampires. A form of active vampirism is known as sanguinary vampirism where people who consider themselves as “real vampires” consume human blood voluntarily donated from people. Their logic behind this? Feeding off human blood makes up for a deficiency of proper energy processing throughout their bodies. Most outsiders find that this extreme practice of religion should be banned. But, thanks to the First Amendment, it is protected. You see, to allow something is not the same as to condone it or agree with it. Do I agree with the ways of those who believe in vampirism? No. But because of the First Amendment we must allow it. So, let me ask this: If a practice of religion such as vampirism is allowed in today’s society, then why shouldn’t Fred Phelps’ practice of religion be allowed? According to the constitution, we are given the natural right to be a part of whatever religion we choose or no religion whatsoever. So for me to say that just because I don’t agree something it needs to be banned seems a little extreme am I wrong? This is why I rule in favor of the Phelps family. “…What about freedom of speech? Should we limit speech from people we find abhorrent? Should we limit racists from speaking? I don’t want to be associated with those people, but I also don’t want to limit their speech in any way in the sense that we tolerate boorish and uncivilized behavior because that’s one of the things freedom requires; is that we allow people to be boorish and uncivilized, but that doesn’t mean that we approve of it.” This was said by junior United States senator of Kentucky, Randall Howard or also known as Rand Paul. Limiting speech is what helps keep this country out of total chaos. On the flipside however, the more speech we limit, the more chaos will be caused. In the Texas v. Johnson case it is apparent that if limitations don’t stop, then freedom of speech will no longer exist. Also, just like in the Texas case, Fred Phelps and his family are not causing any violence. Some find the protest offensive, yet no physical damage is being done. In the Skokie case, it is stated that “under the First Amendment there is no such thing as a false idea.” This means that even a controversial subject still deserves every right that should be given to them. If a precedent is set, then no matter the circumstance it must be followed for every group. There are ideas we all have, but there are no wrong opinions. If we begin to limit these ideas and opinions, then we would no longer have a purpose for the First Amendment. In the N.A.R.A. case Favish is granted some but
Show More

Related Documents: Essay on supreme court decision

Supreme Court Decision

Supreme Court Decision Marie A. Spicer HIS303 Professor Connor November 8, 2013 Thesis Even though no one has a right to end a life, why take it out on an innocent baby. If you become pregnant then you should give birth, or should you? Roe verses Wade was a Landmark decision for Woman. The right to an abortion is without a doubt a decision that should be made by the women. The moment of conception is indeed life. Abortion is something I do not believe in for…

Words 1129 - Pages 5

The Implications Of Supreme Court Decisions In The United States

that Supreme Court decisions have in the United States. Decisions that are made through the judicial system, are the result of many hours of deliberation and contemplation. These rulings and decisions can pertain to many topics, and can bind parties in the litigation, or the entire nation as a whole! When these decisions are made and passed down, they are extremely powerful and far reaching. Decisions can alter how people conduct their daily lives, while at the same time effecting how the court is…

Words 518 - Pages 3

The Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Decision Making

The Supreme Court has the responsibility of making sure that whatever law our government wishes to pass are within the rights of every citizen and does not exceed its power. The Supreme Court make all the decisions that constitutes new law involving Congress that will go into effect as well as notifying Congress that a law it passed violate the Constitution. The judges that make these decision on behalf of the United States are individuals who will not serve one term as a justice or a brief period…

Words 686 - Pages 3

The Supreme Courts In Taking Law Seriously By Barry Friedman

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest institution of the judicial branch of the U.S. Government. According to Barry Friedman in his article, “Taking Law Seriously”, we must understand the powers of the Supreme Court in order to understand how it effects national policy and law. The U.S. Supreme Court has the power of judicial review; thus, they can handle and determine the constitutionality of a law or executive decision. This power is enacted to settle constitutional debates on issues…

Words 658 - Pages 3

Judicial Restraint or Activism Essay

Judicial Restraint or Judicial Activism The Supreme Court of the United States is a widely controversial topic because they decide what parts of our legislation follow the basic principles set in our constitution. Decisions made by the Supreme Court are often 5-4 votes, with one member generally being a swing vote. Members of the Supreme Court are not elected; they are appointed and serve until resignation or death. Each member of the Supreme Court has a different point of view but ultimately decides…

Words 637 - Pages 3

Political Factors Of The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is currently the highest of the judicial courts in the country, with nine justices and judicial precedence over the existing courts in the nation. The Supreme Court Justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated for their positions by the president, then judged and possibly appointed by the United States Senate. Being appointed by both the president and the United States Senate, there is possibility that certain factors may influence the decisions done…

Words 1512 - Pages 7

Essay about Power of Supreme Court

The Power of the Supreme Court Cannot be Justified in a Democracy (45) The US Supreme Court has a number of powers. These include the power to declare acts of Congress, the executive or state legislatures unconstitutional through the power of judicial review. The supreme court justices are also given the power to interpret the constitution when making decisions, again, through their power of judicial review. It is arguable that it is essential for the supreme court to have such powers in order…

Words 919 - Pages 4

Supreme Court Cases: The Ableman V. Booth Case

Introduction The Ableman v. Booth case was one of the most important Supreme Court cases in the 19th century. The landmark case dealt with the powers of the state courts in comparison to the Supreme Court as well as the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. The Fugitive Slave Act was passed as a part of the Compromise of 1850 which also included other compromises and acts in order to appease both the North and South following the annexation of the state of California. (“Transcript of Compromise of 1850”).…

Words 923 - Pages 4

Roe Vs. Wade Case Study

The Roe vs. Wade case began in Texas when a woman named Jane Roe wanted to terminate her pregnancy. After two years, the court invalidated the Texas law by a 7-2 vote. The majority of the justices maintained that a right to privacy was implied by the ninth and fourteenth amendment. These two amendments protect the rights of people who are living within the United States. These stated that no state could restrict abortions during the first three months, known as a trimester, of a pregnancy. Because…

Words 864 - Pages 4

Salience Supreme Court

Salience, Support and the Perception of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court is generally regarded as the weakest branch of government despite the institution’s reputation for being legalistic, nonpartisan and apolitical. The Court’s reputation, or institutional legitimacy, relies heavily on the general public’s perception and approval of their case decisions (Nicholson and Hansford 2014; Bybee 2010; Malhortha and Jessee 2014). This being because, when the judiciary was created, it was primarily…

Words 1842 - Pages 8