The Controversy Over Gun Control

Words: 1032
Pages: 5

The Issue Over Gun Control In a city park on a sunny day, the sound of sudden gunfire sends families running, which shows the growing importance of effective gun control. The main issue in this outline is the controversy over gun control. The first article argues that we need more gun control and was written by Ronak Mohanty (a staff writer for The Current Wave) and the second article argues that gun control doesn’t work and was written on the NRA website.

The issue of gun control is mainly about balancing individual rights, such as the Second Amendment, with the need for measures to reduce gun violence and keep the public safe. Gun control is controversial because of deeply rooted beliefs and ideas about the Second Amendment, differing views
…show more content…
Premise 2) To reduce mass shootings, effective gun control measures should be put into place, such as universal background checks, restrictions on high-capacity magazines, and thorough mental health tests. Premise 3) Protecting individual rights/freedoms requires implementing regulations to mitigate the risks that go along with nationwide access to firearms. Conclusion. Therefore, increasing effective gun control, including universal background checks and consequential restrictions, while investing in strong mental health resources, is absolutely necessary for promoting public safety, protecting individual freedoms, and reducing gun violence overall. A suppressed premise implies that advocates for gun control argue for its effectiveness based on observational evidence and research. Some contingent facts suggest that, in legal and political contexts, recent court rulings or legislative changes impact gun control laws. Socio-economic factors may influence people gaining access to firearms in different communities. Statistical data correlates effective gun control with reduced gun-related deaths. Evidence that the adequateness of mental health resources is an underlying cause of gun violence. There doesn’t seem to be any fallacies, and all premises and conclusions seem to be valid as long as there is supporting evidence for the …show more content…
According to data from the first commentary, countries with stricter gun control laws have lower gun suicide and homicide rates. My argument is not in alignment with the second commentary/article. While both articles make good arguments about gun control, the data shows that there are less deaths when there is more gun control, but also that there are less deaths when law-abiding citizens carry firearms. There are other views towards gun control that include entirely focussing on mental health initiatives, emphasizing a focus on education and training for safe gun handling, or viewing the issue from a lawful standpoint by understanding state and local