The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Power

Words: 1201
Pages: 5
Open Document
Many people believe that the president has the ultimate power to do whatever he or she wants. Though that may be somewhat true, there are a lot of limitations that the president can and cannot do. I know for one, the president is able to declare war. Though, there obviously has to be a good reason for him or her to declare something like that. The Constitution was written over 200 years ago. The people that wrote up the Constitution never knew that the U.S. would become a rich country having developed many new form of technology. This includes nuclear weapons, rockets, computers, and television. With the new technology, especially nuclear weapons, this means that someone needs to have the ultimate power over them. This is where the president …show more content…
This power is still honored today. Some discussions, such as possible tax cuts, are taking place not only in both house, but as well as the executive branch. The impeachment of power is the authority to charge the president with wrongdoing. This means that a majority vote can impeach an elected official. The president won’t be so powerful after that happens. In the Senate, major presidential appointments must be confirmed by them. The Senate offers what is called “Advice and Consent”, which is a majority vote on the appointments of federal judges, ambassadors, and Cabinet positions. Also treaties with other nations must be approved by a two-thirds vote by the Senate. This is an illustration of checks and balances and has served a very important restriction to foreign powers to the president. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, which means that it can overturn laws it rules to be unconstitutional. Neither the president nor Congress has any power to override a Supreme Court decision. The system of checks and balances often results in dramatic clashes between the three branches of government. This includes the Supreme Courts reversals of major laws being passed by Congress. The president doesn’t really have much say in laws. He or she is only the enforcer of them. He or she doesn’t have the power to make them. They can veto them however, but can be overridden as mentioned …show more content…
My thoughts about our government has not been very pleasant. And there are very good reasons for that. The same goes for some of our presidents that we have had over the past few years. After reading about all of the things that the president is able to do, I feel that he or she doesn’t really have that much power. Everything that happens has to either go through the Senate or Congress. I think that this is a good thing because like I said before, with a lot of power, it can all go to your head. If a president has all the power in the world to make laws, send out nuclear weapons, veto everything, etc., I believe that our world would have ended a long time ago. Having people below the president giving feedback and suggestions on what is constitutional and what is not gives our nation another opportunity of survival. Before I even started taking this government class, I knew only about the president being able to declare war. I never knew that within the Constitution, it states that Congress were the only ones allowed to declare war. This goes to show that the president can abuse his or her powers and change what the Constitution believes it right. That’s why they called it checks and balances. I hate to bring it up, but I feel it is necessary because of this upcoming election. This is going to be my first time being able to vote for a new president and I feel that whoever wins, our country isn’t
Show More

Related Documents: The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Power

President of the United States and N.d. Web. Essay

Bolshakova Point-Counterpoint Persuasive Essay October 21, 2014 Is Obama abusing executive power and weakening our nation? According to Article II, Section 1 Clause 1 of the Constitution “The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” (Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2014.) This passage refers to the significance that the President holds in the executive power. These authority entities the influence of the affairs of the government, decisions made…

Words 1558 - Pages 7

Populist Downfall

make further progress after 1892. The fusion Populists, people who sought to merge with one of the major parties, argued that Populist party could never hold national power as a third party because of its dependence on regions. And their strategy was to cooperate with the Democrats, supporting William Jennings Bryan for the presidential election in 1896. (1) Bryan demanded for “free coinage” of silver, the unrestricted minting of silver money. While Bryan’s free-silver platform attracted numerous Populists…

Words 264 - Pages 2

What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

Electoral College gives swing states too much power, people feel their vote does not matter,…

Words 1274 - Pages 6

Parlimentarism Vs Federalism

single member plurality districts, presidential veto. Let’s start with federalism, federalism gives people opportunities to get involved into politics on any level such as state local or national levels and also has a greater possibility that their vote will make an impact on whatever is being voted on. In an article I found online it states that “Federalism is the theory or advocacy of federal principles for dividing powers between member units and common institutions. Unlike…

Words 652 - Pages 3

Pros And Cons Of Unitary Executive Theory

How much power is too much power one may ask? Power for what, who, when why, well let’s take a closer look and conduct research over the topic of Unitary Executive Theory (UET). The Unitary Executive Theory is a theory of American constitutional law holding that the President possesses the power to control the entire executive branch. So how much power would be too much power when allowing the President to make decisions. This theory was implemented by the Bust administration and was claimed to justify…

Words 509 - Pages 3

Pros And Cons Of Losing The Electoral College

wins the popular vote should be the president. But im completely bias right now because the person i voted for lost the electoral college but won the popular vote. But there is a lot of reasons why we should move on from the electoral colleges. One con is that the person who us Americans favor to win may not win because some smaller states have more of the percentage of electoral votes. It also makes it more complicated and dissuades people from voting because when you really think about it the popular…

Words 256 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of Crystal Village

On the contrary, indirect usually takes slower process. When the petition meets the standard, the proposals go on the ballot (O’Neil 2015). Both types seem very new and effective for me, but always there are pros and cons. If politicians are ignoring the concerns of their citizen, the initiative can be a good tool that people can pass the law by themselves and it is a more direct democracy. However, the law made by normal people cannot be always constitutional.There…

Words 1328 - Pages 6

Adversity Amendment

This Amendment will help secure America in the face of great adversity. Your amendment will ensure that the office of the president and thereby the position of commander in chief remains unchanged throughout the course of a world war or a war on American soil. This document is meant to explain and defend the necessity that this become law. Having a guiding light of unchanging leadership would strengthen the country in the case of invasion or global warfare. Between 1933-1945, Franklin D. Roosevelt…

Words 586 - Pages 3

Essay On Electoral College Should Be Abolished

In a world where equality was the norm, where would the Electoral College stand? When America was created, our Founding Fathers created the Electoral College with the Common Good in mind in order to keep uneducated voters from having too much power. Although this may be true to a certain extent, these reasons are insensible no longer relevant or. The Founding Fathers never deeply considered Individual Rights, and how the voters of America could affected with this system, particularly in that many…

Words 1188 - Pages 5

Essay about Forms of Government and the Human Condition

the elected representatives in creation of laws. Democracy’s creation of laws is for each citizen individual equal and free. Direct democracy is most beneficial party to the human condition, because either one person in monarchy holds the power, or power is held by a small number of individuals, as in an oligarchy. Most important way to define democracy is by equality, freedom, and freedom of laws. In democrat party everyone gets the equal right in the party to vote for the right person and give…

Words 978 - Pages 4