The topic I have chosen to discuss today is : whether it should be compulsory to vaccinate all children.
Parents should not be compelled by law to poison their children with this man-made artificial immunity. Many primary care providers and parents who assume that the vaccine program was developed on sound principles will be overwhelmed at the flimsy foundations of immunisation science. Vaccines are treated preparations containing bacteria or viruses that are used to artificially induce immunity against a specific disease through artificial means. Compulsory legislation on vaccination are forcing parents to murder their own children with this synthetic and imitated immunisation. Vaccinations have never been …show more content…
If vaccinations saved people from infectious disease, then those who are vaccinated should have no concerns about being “exposed” to or amongst the unvaccinated children. They’re vaccinated ; they should be immune. Isn’t that correct? Let’s be clear, vaccination is not immunisation. There is only one kind of immunity and that is natural immunity which is achieved by battling the disease itself. Vaccination is just merely the artificial triggering of temporary responses to manmade pathogens. According to the Immunisation Awareness Society (IAS), only 0.2% of unvaccinated children suffer from asthma. This is barely credible to conclude that no vaccination is the cause. A research was formally conducted in September 2011 by Dr Andreas Bachmair, a German researcher. The results showed that vaccinated children were five times more likely to suffer a variety of diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children. Dr Bachmair confirm that the prevalence of many condition in unvaccinated children were also significantly decreased. Only 0.21 % of unvaccinated children were diagnosed with dyslexia and only 0.06% were confirmed affected by Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Therefore, unvaccinated children pose no severe risk as exaggerated by many