There is debate surrounding cochlear-implants, electronic devices that restore partial hearing to the deaf .Many parents of deaf children are opposed for their children to get the cochlear implant because of the change to their children’s lives. Sme may believe, that there are individuals who are agree with placing the cochlear implants on their children because it would provide them with a better life. The cochlear implant is a positive thing for deaf children because the benefits far outweigh the risks.
There are many benefits, of the cochlear implants, that would improve their auditory ability. Hearing experiences such as discriminate pitch and loudness, use the telephone and enjoy music. Many can watch TV more easily. In addition, many are ably to hear …show more content…
For example, in the film. Heather’s father is in extremely in opposition toward anything that would remove deafness or a deaf person from their community because he describes deafness as living in heaven, without suffering and any kind of worries, no offence, and without any discrimination from the community, able to be admired by society. Irrationality, in the way that finding a cure for deafness, that might keep them away from a happiness. The deaf community is able to interact with each other, support each other even though, they are not able to talk, through signs language. Individuals determinate a disability as a melancholic, they believe deafness is disability where it can be lived in a peaceful and enjoyable environment such as sharing their experiences in the community and spending time with their families imagining. Another last example is, the Springiness family has an outstanding and unique testament to family passion, tireless responsibility to children and everlasting love. The ability of interacting with hearing people and earning good grades in school. Heather is depicted as moving between the hearing and deaf worlds comfortably and developing and embracing death culture as well as having friends who are