Who Was Guilty? Essay

Submitted By riky46
Words: 549
Pages: 3
Open Document
Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury, a dual suicide has occurred. Romeo and Juliet have taken their lives in an attempt to be with each other. Who, might I add has caused this? The rather complicated and persistent question of Romeo and Juliet still eludes society. This individual has precipitated the death of the young star-crossed lovers and brought sorrow to both families. Though with intents of fusing both families for peace, death became the unexpected result. This suspect is none other than the holy monk of the church, Friar Lawrence.
The Friar disagrees to marry the young couples, however changes his mind after considering that peace will result. Thinking, of course, of the consequences by marrying Romeo and Juliet, the Friar marries them in secret with only Balthasar and the Nurse as witnesses. His understanding of the situation escalates through the death of Mercutio and Tybalt. This in return, has Romeo banished from Verona and reconsiders the mind of both Capulet’s to allow Paris to take Juliet’s hand in marriage. Juliet, still mourning over Romeo’s banishment, flees to Friar Lawrence hoping to seek guidance of postponing the marriage. This leads to the Friar’s second mistake, giving Juliet a poison to enter a death-like coma. His third and final mistake was of not informing the messenger that the letter was of high importance. This in return results in Romeo’s action in taking his own life. Friar Lawrence, of course, is a holy man. He would never harm another being for any cause. Therefore proving he never killed the two. Friar Lawrence isn’t the only suspect as well. Capulet not only forced Juliet to marry Paris, but also threatened to disown her and cut her financially. The Nurse begs Juliet to consider marrying Paris, proving her feelings toward Romeo were as they say “sour”. Lady Capulet, mourning over Tybalt’s death, threatened to send over someone and deliver a killing blow to Romeo in Mantua. The more suspects that pop up give the Jury the opportunity to look over this case. The Friar is the most suspicious of all with the following proof that will be shown to the
Show More

Related Documents: Who Was Guilty? Essay

My Cousin Linny's Reignmen Arraignment

witnesses pointed out towards the two boys, and the sheriff who had caught the boys by surprise claimed that they had made a confession (Lynn, 1992). A confession is however recorded or signed to prove its existence. The sheriff did not provide these documents or forms of evidence to the court. Vinny, who was the defense attorney, should have done more to ensure that the case did not go to trial but didn’t although all the evidence presented was circumstantial. The judge, however, set the trial date when…

Words 567 - Pages 3

Twelve Angry Men Essay

Man is a drama which was written by Reginald Rose and was broadcast as a television play in 1954. It became a successful film in 1957 which concerned the deliberations of the jury of a homicide trial. It was a strained debate between twelve gentlemen about an 18-year-old boy who was accused to kill his father guilty or not guilty. It was a really interesting and dramatic situation. In the movie, there are 12 men with different characteristics. However, there are two jurors who stand out and the most…

Words 560 - Pages 3

Randall Adams Guilty

Randall Adams is pronounced guilty in the film "The Thin Blue Line," but there could've been more evidence of David Harris. Adams is given the death penalty due to Texas being a big supporter of it. Some countries and states have put an end to capital punishment because sometimes there are innocent people who are said to be guilty. There have been many times when they found people wrongfully guilty, but the death penalty was already in place. People's opinion on the death penalty is inhumane. At…

Words 280 - Pages 2

David Eldridge's Not Guilty: Case Study

Fun restaurant was found murdered! One of the most loyal employees, David Eldridge of the restaurant, framed him as guilty and he was not the one to commit the crime. There is much more evidence that proves Mr. Eldridge is not guilty of the crime. The strongest evidence in this case is that David Eldridge was one of Mr. Armes's employees who worked for him. His fingerprints were found near the crime scene, but he was working there earlier. Also, his defense team proves he is not guilty of the crime…

Words 265 - Pages 2

Lool: To Kill a Mockingbird and Children Essay

a colored innocent man was the right thing to do. He explains to Scout that although kids may tease her, she must use her words to show the other children at school that her father defending a black man is the right thing. After Robinsons first verdict, Atticus seems disappointed that they lost but reassures Robinson that they will have another chance to prove him not guilty. “We’re not through this yet. They’ll be another appeal, you can count on that’’ (213). Atticus was determined to get another…

Words 518 - Pages 3

Monster By Walter Dean Myers Character Analysis

Can you have a verdict of being innocent but still be known as guilty as stated by the judge? When would the judge announce that someone is guilty after been “proven” innocent? Innocence might seem really simple, but it really isn’t. For example when you play with your sibling and don’t do anything wrong. While meantime you know you are innocent and your parents believe your sibling? Sometimes we are blamed for things we don’t do, even by those we trust? One way or the other, guilt is when you feel…

Words 1022 - Pages 5

Rhetorical Devices In 12 Angry Men

Analysis Three stages of thinking in this film is when they first got there information. Then the information was processed and they thought about the information given. Lastly they created their coherent thought with the help of other people's thoughts and opinions. The first stage of thinking was the gathering of information. In this movie the first information that was gathered was that the boy had murdered his father. The second stage of thinking is when you process the information given.…

Words 907 - Pages 4

Insanity Defense and Mental Illness Essay examples

to defend the actions of a person who drinks alcohol and then murders someone. Why not? This rule cannot be used to defend the actions of a person who drinks too much then murders someone because that person made the choice to get that drunk. Someone who is mentally ill does not make the choice to be that way. Identify each of the following: Rational and guilty- That means the person knows the difference between right and wrong when they did the crime. Guilty but insane- This is when someone is…

Words 311 - Pages 2

Abandonment And Guilt In The Book Thief

guilt in the novel when things happen to her or when she does something. Liesel watched her brother, Werner, die in the train car when they were going to their foster parents’ house. It says in the beginning of the story “ For Liesel Meminger, there was the imprisoned stiffness of movement and the staggered onslaught of thoughts...this isn’t happening. This isn’t happening.”(21) When Liesel’s brother died, she felt in shock that it happened, and that she would all be by herself, without anyone she…

Words 661 - Pages 3

12 angry men Essay

that, if found guilty, the mandatory sentence for the accused is the death penalty. After these instructions, the jurors enter. The men file in and decide to take a short break before deliberating. They complain that the room is hot and without air-conditioning; even the fan doesn’t work. All the jurors presume the obvious guilt of the defendant, whom we learn has been accused of killing his father. Eventually, the twelve sit down and a vote is taken. All of the jurors vote “guilty,” except for…

Words 1118 - Pages 5