Burglary Case

Words: 1551
Pages: 7
Open Document
Angel Olsen is not likely to be convicted of second-degree murder for the killing of Kendrick Lamar during his commission of burglary. Burglary defined at common law, is the“ breaking and entering of a mansion-house in the night with the intent to commit a felony”. People v. Martin, 168 Cal. App. 3d 1111 (5th Dist. Ct. App. 1985). Burglary under California penal code §459 is the entering of a structure “with the intent to commit grand or petit larceny or any felony”. Cal.pen §459. The latter burglary can be held in the first degree or second degree depending on the underlying elements of the case, i.e. if the structure is inhabited. California Penal code §197 (4) allows justification for those who commit homicide when “ in attempting by lawful …show more content…
“ The person making an arrest is acting lawfully if the force and means used are such as would be considered necessary by the ordinarily reasonable person placed in the same position and if, from the standpoint of such as reasonable person, the force and means used was necessarily apparent”. People v. Martin, 168 Cal. App. 3d 1111 (5th Dist. Ct. App. 1985). We know the burglary occurred in the night, which constitutes as common law burglary. We also know common law burglary is more sever in nature than statutory burglary. It could be reasoned that the ordinary person attempting to make an arrest of two men for burglary in the night would find it reasonable to have a weapon present at the time of the apprehension. In people v. Martin, a case similar to this one, a father was vindicated by a California Court when he shot and killed a perpetrator in an attempted apprehension for common law burglary. It is probable to assume Angel Olsen did attempt to arrest the victim by lawful ways and means. Conversely, it can be argued by the state that because Angel Olsen fired not one, but two additional shots, she intended to kill, not apprehend and therefore did not attempt to detain by lawful ways and …show more content…
From Angel Olsen’s taped confession it can be inferred that when she ordered the victim to “Hold it right there. I’ve got a gun,” she was attempting to make a lawful arrest. The victim was seen inside of the establishment unauthorized at approximately 2a.m. This is clearly burglary under the common law statute “breaking and entering of a mansion-house in the night”. The precedent case tells us a homicide is justifiable when (1) a person has actually committed a felony (2) the perpetrator is fleeing or resisting and cannot otherwise be taken. Disregarding Angel Olsen’s command and attempting to escape, it is likely Kendrick Lamar could not be taken any other way. In People v. Martin which has a closely similar fact pattern, two unarmed participants in the nighttime burglary of his son’s temporarily unoccupied residence while the that participant was fleeing from the scene of the burglary was shot and killed by Martin. The court held that he was justified under section 197, subsection 4. “ The undisputed facts show that the defendant necessarily committed the homicide in attempting by lawful ways and means to apprehend the victim while fleeing from the scene of his nighttime residential burglary”. People v. Martin, 168 Cal. App. 3d 1111 (5th Dist. Ct.
Show More

Related Documents: Burglary Case

Case Study Pc 459 Vehicle Burglary

INTRODUCTION: This case involves an unknown suspect(s) smashing open the victim’s driver side rear vehicle window, and stealing items from inside, in violation of PC 459-Vehicle Burglary. LOCATION: The location is the level 1B parking lot, located west of the T.J. Maxx store located at 455 S. Lake Avenue. EVIDENCE: None. LOSS: • A Michael Kors purse (white and beige in color and worth $185.00) which contained: $985.00 in US currency, a light brown Coach Wallet (worth $280.00), a Macy’s credit…

Words 487 - Pages 2

Case Report: 579 Vassar Road Burglary

On 4/23/18 at 18:00 hours I was dispatched to 579 Vassar Road for a burglary. Dispatch advised the owners of the property had already been through the house and no one else was on scene. Due to the nature of the incident I responded priority two. Upon arrival, I spoke with Annmarie Ruiz. She advised that she returned home at approximitly 17:50 hours, and noticed that the drawrs to her dresser were open. Annmarie advised she then went to speak with her husband, Brian Ruiz, to see if he was…

Words 366 - Pages 2

Weisman V. Alabama Case Summary

edu WRITING SAMPLE MEMORANDUM TO: Senior Attorney FROM: Alexander Bernard RE: Weisman Burglary Matter DATE: October 3, 2023 QUESTION PRESENTED. Under Alabama’s burglary statute, 13A-7-7, does Miriam Weisman have absolute authority to enter her apartment as an occupant after a four-day absence following the termination of a pre-marital relationship with the co-occupant? BRIEF ANSWER I. Likely, yes. Alabama cases have defined absolute authority as an entry by a person who is an occupant of the habitable…

Words 1299 - Pages 6

Plea Bargain

bargain is an agreement between both the defense and prosecution in a criminal case. In the agreement, the defendant will plead guilty in the hopes of attaining a lenient sentence or sometimes even the dismissal of certain charges. The argument most would make in favor of allowing plea agreements would be that “pleading guilty instead of going to trial reduces uncertainty as to the outcome of a trial; in trying a case before a judge or before a jury of 12 people, the defendant cannot predict what…

Words 468 - Pages 2

Research: Sergeant and Officer Terry Schield Essay

|Midtown, MN 55304 | | [pic] 4/14/13 2013-098 MIDTOWN POLICE ARREST MAN ON CHARGES OF BURGLARY AND LARCENY OF LOCAL MARKET On Sunday, March 3, 2013, at 12:05 am., a man stole a hammer from Rusty Fenders Body Shop located at 627 Main St. The suspect used a back alley to access Marquette’s Market and smashed the lock to the back door.…

Words 373 - Pages 2

Magistrates Court's Act 1980

evidence. Magistrates need to decide whether the offence committed is classed as summary only, either way or indictable only offences. Summary only offences (driving) are minor offences which can be dealt by the magistrate. Either way offences (theft, burglary) are more serious offences which tend to be tried in the crown court but could also be tried in the magistrate’s court. Indictable offences (murder, robbery) can only be tried in the crown court. If the…

Words 372 - Pages 2

Burglary Vs Hymon

On October 3, 1974, a possible burglary in progress was reported to the Memphis Police Department. Officers Elton Hymon and Leslie Wright responded to the burglary call at 10:45 p.m. that night. Upon their arrival to the scene, the neighbor that had called in the possible burglary pointed the Officers in the direction of the house. As officers Hymon and Wright surveyed the scene, Wright called in to dispatch to say that officers had arrived to answer the burglary in progress call and Hymon walked…

Words 903 - Pages 4

Dimaya V. Sessions Case Summary

In the matter of the Dimaya v. Sessions case, I find that Dimaya has presented and demonstrated a more clear, constitutional argument, therefore, the supreme court should rule in their favor. In the case, it is understood under 18 U.S.C. § 16, that a crime of violence law is an offensive felony that involves a substantial risk of physical force against a person or property(crime of violence). However, in this specific case, the crime of violence law shouldn’t affect Dimaya. What Dimaya was convicted…

Words 1006 - Pages 5

A Political Scandal: The Watergate

close aides of President Nixon. On June 19, 1972, it was released that one of the Watergate burglars was a Republican Party security aide. Attorney General John Mitchell, head of the CRP, had refused to admit to any involvement in the Watergate burglary or have any previous knowledge of the act nor the participants. On August 1st, about twenty-five thousand dollars was deposited into a United States and a Mexican bank account by Bernard Barker and it was said to be a check from the 1972 campaign…

Words 939 - Pages 4

Decker Case Analysis

Count Two of the criminal complaint, possession of equipment to manufacture methamphetamine, should be dismissed on the ground that it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, manufacture of methamphetamine ("meth"). The issue in the present case is whether §43: Possession of Equipment or Supplies with Intent to Manufacture Meth (“Possession of Equipment”) should be dismissed because it is a lesser-included offense of Count Three, §51: Manufacture of Meth. A defendant cannot be charged with…

Words 720 - Pages 3