Civil disobedience can be a touchy subject for some, but it is a topic that needs to be addressed, not ignored. This country was founded on the knowledge that laws, if declared unjust by the people, could be protested and with the gain of enough support, overthrown. The Founding Fathers saw that on certain things and at certain times, a government may become corrupted, unconnected with its people, or just simply stuck in their ways. There are many examples of all of these circumstances that can be observed throughout history and in modern times. For example, if civil disobedience was in favor of rights, such as group rights, like that of the civil rights movement, or individual rights, like that of Kim Davis, they are a positive for democracy; however, if they are in service of pet causes and not related to rights, such as it was with the case of the Dakota Pipeline, it is a negative for democracy. One of the most well known examples of civil disobedience is that of Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement. They used such means as …show more content…
The pipeline has been protested for quite some time as being wrong for going through a tribe's sacred ground. However in this case, instead of logical thoughts and honest truth being the primary objective, these have instead given way to the mob-rule way of thinking which creates a hole in a persons mind of although no rights are being trampled upon, there is still protest because of the human desire to always get what we want. It also shows the human nature of the constant need to disagree and fight, and though this trait could be good, even helpful at times it can be harmful when carried over to issues where it is not necessary, such as this. This type of civil disobedience shows that when conducted in the wrong way and for the wrong reasons, it can be harmful to