Jeffrey from Rutgers University writes the book “National Issues, Local Interests, and the Transformation of Antebellum North Carolina Politics”. Jeffrey talks about the parties Whigs and Democrats and their views on Religion and if it should be a laissez faire government or a paternalistic government. Also the shift of national issues to local issues. The national issues were that the voters weren’t interested in banking, tariffs, and other national economic issues. The local issues were the role of the government in promoting social morality which led up to culture clashes such as nativism, anti-Catholicism, and temperance. The citizens wanted to government to be more hands on and helped the people to become a paternalistic government you can …show more content…
The act was passed by the congress with the goal of the people have the right within the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery. This Act was served to revoke the Dred Scott controversy of stating that The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was not constitutional of what I was talking about earlier. The Dred Scott increased the sectional conflict between the country in the civil war significantly by 3 reasons: In the North, the Dred Scott decision fueled anti-slavery and strengthened the Republican Party. In the South, it encouraged proslavery, secessionist and to make demands in Congress. For many Northerners, the Dred Scott decision implied that slavery could move lightly into the North and Southerners viewed the decision as a validation of their position in the nation. The Court ruled that Congress had no authority to prohibit the expansion of slavery in new federal territories, abolishing the Missouri Compromise. The Dred Scott which is slavery in a way fueled the sectional tensions to civil war the most because it put both the north and south on edge the most by the fact the north felt slavery would expand after the fact and the south would not change their viewpoint on