In the 2000s, every state adopted its own learning standards that defined what students should be learning in grades 3-12. This was defined into what students should be able to do at each grade level all the way up until graduation …show more content…
There has been extensive research that has been conducted, and many experts on the various subjects that have contributed to the process of making the standards. The skills required by the common core have been agreed upon by experts to be the most essential, and are based on the twenty first century skills. “The criteria are based on international benchmarks and incorporate the newest educational thinking” (McDonnell, 2013). The idea has been to build upon the successful elements already being used in many of the leading states in education. Again the goal of common core was to supply a national standard in teaching. In the article Organized Interests and the Common Core McDonnell states that, “It’s almost like neutral ground. It is common territory that we all have to get right; in the group interest as well as the interest of shared constituents” (McDonnell, 2013). That statement further supports that the goal was to provide a national standard and leveling the playing field in …show more content…
It was reported that, “Common core standards do not represent a meaningful advance over existing state standards” (Porter, 2011). As of now the common core standards are broad and not very specific. With implementing common core standards in the school system there will have to be assessment tests, and these assessments will be on-line. This now means that school districts will have to spend more on computers, internet, and software with funds that are not readably available. This also means that the school district will be held responsible for making sure that all students will have access to these