Absolutist approaches
Absolutism …show more content…
Nothing is instinctively wrong or right. Relativism values context and is opinionated. Since moral values differ, the punishment would be different too. An example of this is: for homicide in the UK the maximum penalty of 14 years in prison, but the maximum sentence for manslaughter is 10 years. They are the same crime but with a different context leading to a different punishment. There are different types of relativism such as culture relativism- regarding other beliefs values or culture of other people. For example: Islamic countries would expect woman to cover up if they were to visit. Relative ethics is teleological, meaning that it recognises content can differ with contrasting views. Some things are unjustifiable and others are with consequences. Aristotle was a teleological thinker as he attempted to describe things in terms of their purpose or goal (Aristotle’s theory of virtue and the four causes). Advantage of relative ethics is that it allows for the diversity that is present in the world. People can act how they want and have their opinion heard without it being labelled as wrong. Another advantage is it understands that life is not black and white unlike absolutism; it takes context into consideration and allows appropriate consequences to be given. Cultures may believe that their practices are more justifiable than other cultural practices, but by using a relativist approach, this will allow for acceptance between different people meaning that there would be fewer arguments over whose values are more important. There are downfalls to relative approaches. Just because there are different moral views, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are all of equal value. For example, the Nazis believed that they were right to kill millions of Jews, homosexuals and disabled people. If we