Some of the current research takes a theoretical approach to the influence of education on crime. One of the approaches that was used in the literature surrounding the topic of education and its effect on criminality, was the social bonding theory first proposed by Hirschi. This theory suggests that strong social bonds lead to less crime (Han et al., 2017). In many cases the suggestion that teacher and peer connections made at school work to provide support for students that inevitably leads to the prevention of criminal activity. Attachment theory further reinforces this idea but suggesting …show more content…
The ones of main focus are before-school and after-school programs. These programs are developed as a means of providing students with necessary social bonds and skills needed to become successful citizens of society (Han et al., 2017). These programs include but are not limited to clubs such as breakfast club, homework club. By attending these clubs, students are able to communicate with teachers and peers outside of the classroom and in a manner that provides them with the necessary support systems they need to make correct life choices. In addition to these programs there are also programs that work to help students manage their behavioral concerns. These programs offer alternative ways in which children can react or manage their anger rather than acting out in ways that are not approved of. This helps in preventing crime as connections have been made between behavioral exceptionalities and the tendency to make poor life choices due to factors such as impulsivity (Murray et al., 2014). Further, programs such as ones similar to Head Start are federally funded programs that seek to help at-risk youth by integrating them into school settings early so that they can adapt by the time they are meant to begin kindergarten. This works as a preventative program for crime as it ensures that at-risk students can achieve success and support at an early age so that they can carry …show more content…
The primary gap that is present is the fact that majority of the literature focuses on the influence of education on adult criminality and therefore overlook the effect of education on youth crime. As stated before this is important to take into account as there are considerable differences between youth and adult criminality. Along with the idea of effects of education being universal for adults and youth comes the universality of crime. Instead of distinguishing between violent and nonviolent crime a vast majority of the literature combines the two under the general term of crime which is an error as there are difference in cause and behavior that distinguish the two. Furthermore, there are few direct comparisons of education types. One study may focus on Montessori schools, another may focus on public schools and another may focus on private schools but there is a gap in creating a direct comparison between the three. By avoiding this connection, it can become difficult to see what may result in differences between the education types as to what is and is not working. Furthermore, when examining education types, there is a gap in acknowledging individual factors. This is a concern as these individual factors can influence how youth react and interact with these education types thereby effecting the influence it has on them. Moreover, many