Right To Bear Arms Essay

Words: 545
Pages: 3

Canada and the United States have a lot in common when it comes to their overall impact on the North American continent. Both countries developed from the re-settlement of European immigrants seeking a new life in the “New World” and were shaped by the experiences and traditions brought from the old world. Thus, it is easy to see why there are so many similarities between these two English speaking nations. However, why have they taken such drastically different paths when it comes to government policy and laws pertaining to the right to bear arms? In this paper, I will analyze the effectiveness of Canada’s contemporary firearms policies, compare them with firearm policies enacted in the United States, and determine how and why these countries …show more content…
For instance, when the continent was first settled, French immigrants were concentrated in the areas known as Quebec today, while English immigrants re-settled in the southern regions like Ontario. Furthermore, it has been well documented in various historical texts that, unlike the English settlers to the south, the white inhabitants of New France rarely crossed the Atlantic with the intent of staying forever. They were more interested in making money and then returning to Europe while the English settlers planned to farm and make a new life for themselves. These contrasting goals meant that life was a lot easier for the French settlers in the North r than the English settlers who lived on the southern part of the continent. The French only traded since they did not plan on staying permanently, and because of this they never had to fight with the Native Americans for control of the land. This is evidenced by the fact that America had 69 major wars with Native Americans while Canada had none. Furthermore, the